Hi Joost. Gutenprint has all the capabilities but--I think, for B&W, that QTR is still the one to beat. It's (QTR's) facilities for curve generation and ink limiting are an advance over those currently in gutenprint, in my estimation. It's not that gutenprint can't do the same things. It is just that it is not as friendly to use with instrumentation. A jump from what you describe as your current level with QTR to learning how to make advanced curves is likely to be much easier than starting over again with gutenprint. You already have all that you need for the task. If you haven't done so yet check out Paul Rourk's site for all the information he has set out for doing the sort of thing you are looking for with QTR. He has written some tutorials on the topic. I still use QTR for all of my B&W printing. The only reason I began exploring and using Gutenprint is because I had to have some sort of an advanced RIP for color work that I've been doing. I only wish it had some of the same functionality that QTR does. It would make it far easier to use and learn. As it stands, a lot of the parameters in Gutenprint are still buried within it's drivers. You can make adjustments to them but, unless you look at the source code itself, the base parameters are not directly visible to you so your changes are made somewhat blindly. They are not set up as log10 density or Lab values or percentages etc. Also any color management has to be done outside of gutenprint. I hope all that will change as time goes on but it may be awhile. Hope this helps. Duane --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Joost Horsten" <j.h.j.h@...> wrote: > Would could Gutenprint do that QTR cannot? I'm currently using QTR on > a "medium-advanced level", using the QTR algorithms for curve creation. > I expect this to be insufficient to get the best out of > eboni/carbon/cone-6 inksets. But the option to create user curves > should bring this much further. > > I could consider to run a linux printserver iso a windows-based one. > But I'm only going to do that if they're real advantages. > > Joost >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Epson 9500 sold - 9000 as alternative?
2008-07-03 by dlruckus
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.