--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Ernst Dinkla <edinkla@...> wrote: > ... > I see enough difference however between the 9000 quad prints > with 11 picoliter droplets compared to the Z3100 4-6 > picoliter droplets. ... Just to set the record straight, and while I don't dispute that one can see differences in output, it appears the 7000-9000 series has an 8 picoliter fixed droplet size, compared to the 7600-9600 smallest droplet size of 4 picoliters. See http://www.imaging-resource.com/NEWS/1020264609.html and http://www.inkjetart.com/news/archive/IJN_02-20-01.html I think it was the 3000 that had the 11 pl droplet. I suspect the differences in output are more visible on glossy paper than matte paper also. > It is only with more heads used for > black that the smaller droplet will stay. ... I'm not sure if this is the same issue, but Joe at Bowhaus indicated to me that the huge number of nozzles the thermal heads allow is a major advantage to that technology. This had less to do with seeing dots than seeing microbanding and raw speed of printing, which is critical for a business setting where time is money. But, in any case, for my uses the 7500 and with the 6 dilution inksets seem very capable; I think the older 7000-9000 series machines can be very good bargains. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Epson 9500 sold - 9000 as alternative?
2008-07-15 by pr_roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.