That's great info Paul. As far as the LLC goes, if the proportions are the same as the M ink I assume we would start with MIS full C and dilute with the C6 base to something like 15% C to 85% base? Dario --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "pr_roark" <pr_roark@...> wrote: > > Dario, > > Even my old 7500 looks OK at display print size with only 5 carbons > firing. So, in an k2 printer, you'd almost certainly have the > smoothness you need with only 5K. > > I have not loaded a printer with the C6 base carbons in addition to > MIS or Epson LC and LM. On the other hand, in anticipation of this > very issue, I've had a test tube mix of Epson UC M highly diluted in > the C6, generic base for 2 months, and it looks perfect. I favor > Epson M over MIS M. So, diluting UC M with the C6 base is where I > was intending to go with this approach, and so far, I've seen no > evidence of incompatibility. > > (Note that MIS warns that the Eboni-6 inks are not compatible with UC > inks, but it's the commercial dilution base that is the problem. The > C6 base is different.) > > While my test tube experiment is not a guarantee that there will be > no problems, I've seen strange results and very fast settling of UC M > and other pigments in some other bases. In short, my best guess is > that we can buy UC M in 7600 carts and dilute it with C6 base to get > an economical LM. The usual dilution for LM is 30% M to 70% base. A > higher dilution would be smoother. > > Let us know how it works if you give it a try. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: C6+ toners
2008-07-17 by met.graphix
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.