I have to say "it depends." You cannot always shoot to the exact image you want. Sometimes I see it a square or a long horizontal or vertical. I always shoot wider then crop a little. It make look different later and I change my mind. I usually do not print to a given stock size, so it's hard to print to the mat. Some things lend themselves to 8x10, 11x14, etc. The other issue is leaving enough around the print to have sufficient overlap with the mat. Then the printer size is a factor also. Other factors are cropping loose (a little) then cropping to final with the mat. On others I crop exactly and leave a white border (with or without a 2-point line) that exists inside the border of the mat board. For instance, a white 1/2" border within wine-colored black core mat board. I don't think there is a single answer. You have to adjust to both the subject AND how you saw it AND how you see it now. Seth ===================== Posted by: "Michael" michael3442@... Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:00 am (PDT) Now the second part of my query was whether you "print to the matt" or "matt to the print." This is a larger question about how you view your art and how you view photography itself. Remember all the concerns and opinions so hotly debated about whether it's proper to crop a negative image? And the sanctity of using the full frame (to the point of including the film base surrounding the image as part of the finished image)? Similar issues include the use of only lenses that offer a perspective that is most similar to the human eye.
Message
Re: OT: Matting prints
2008-07-21 by Seth Rossman
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.