Digital BW, The Print

In a message dated 8/20/08 1:07:26 PM, jvlist@... writes:


> I've never used the ColorMunki, but have read the reviews of the ColorMunki 
> profiles and
> they are a notch below PFP.
> 

As you note, comparison articles have drawn that conclusion. I can agree, 
from my own testing.

Its also worth noting that ColorMunki software is intentionally limited; 
there are no settings possible for display profiling or printer profiling, so even 
if the default results aren't bad, over time a user is likely to want more 
adjustability, more advanced options etc; which would be available from Spyder3 
products, but with the ColorMunki, you have no options available, and no 
upgrade capabilities, you have to move up to a different product line. The 
Spyder3Studio feature set is much more like that of the much more expensive EyeOne 
product line, while the price is much closer to the ColorMunki, so for those 
interested in features and controls at an affordable price, its quite compelling.

C. David Tobie
WW Product Technology Manager
Digital Imaging & Home Theater
Datacolor
CDTobie@...
www.datacolor.com/Spyder3


**************
It's only a deal if it's where you 
want to go. Find your travel deal here.
      
(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]