--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "djon43" <djon43@...> wrote: > > While I would > > > like to think it would be dust free I know that is effectively > > > impossible. > > > ~Mary > > > > > > I gave up on silver film, partly > > because of the dust problem. > > > > Harry > > > > It doesn't take much skill to eliminate "dust problems." > Use of a lab will inevitably result in scratches, no matter what > you're experiencing at the moment. > > 1) use distilled water, not filtered, for the last change or two of > water (agitating...you do of course use a stainless reel because you > can't properly clean plastic). You can use relatively clean tap water > to mix chems and to do the initial rinses. > > 2) use distilled water, not filtered, with 3 drops Photoflo per 500cc > for a few second dip before hanging. > > 3) hang to dry in a low dust area...in my case, that's a casually > cleaned bathroom, hanging from clips on coat hangers hung in turn on > the shower curtain rod. > > Any small amount of dust that remains can be cloned out in > moments...in extreme cases (carelessness) it can be eliminated with > the lightest Photoshop dust/spot setting (which will conserve some > film character that XP2 and color neg films totally lack to begin > with). IMO if you resort to XP2/color neg you might as well go digital > because your detail resolution and tonal scale will be > better...assuming more than 10mp on APS-C and assuming you don't use > inexpensive zooms. > > An important trick is to avoid polyethlene negative sleeves. Then I guess I lack the "skill to eliminate 'dust problems.'" No Lab involved; I develop my own Ag-based films. No scratch problems whatsoever. SS tank? Check. Photoflo rinse? Check. Hang to dry in closed shower stall? Check. Distilled water rinse? Uh oh. Haven't tried that. Since I have a roll of TMax in the tank, I'll give it a try. Another problem I couldn't solve was film curl. Created scanning problems in my Nikon 4000 ED. The C41 film I get from the local (pro) shop is dead flat. I use PrintFile neg holders, and, indeed, they are polyethlene. The manufacturer claims they are archival and better for not attracting dust. What would you recommend as a alternative? Might as well go digital? Bite your tongue! (As I fondle my M7.) As for tonal scale, my feeling is that the printing workflow may have a greater impact on *my* images. I use K7 piezo inks on (typically) HPR in an Epson 2400. And since I don't do landscapes, perhaps I'm just not seeing the loss of tonal range. (Also, I had originally mentioned the exposure latitude of XP2 which I find valuable in fast shooting situations and tricky lighting.) Nonetheless, I do appreciate the comments/suggestions. I realize there are some heavy hitters (ncluding djon43) here with vastly more experience than I have. Harry
Message
Re: Scan color or B/W better for B/W printing?
2008-08-23 by Harry Lockwood
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.