From chruchy, is it not always easier to make soft than the other way 'round? Eric Eric Neilsen Photo 4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9 Dallas, TX 75226 214 827-8301 http://ericneilsenphotography.com SKype ejprinter _____ From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tyler Boley Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 10:20 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Scan Resolution for a 4X5 Black and White Negatives John, I believe we have the same setup? Give it a try with those 4000 ppi scans, sometimes even open 2. How helpful it is depends on the image and grain. I just do several scans as long as the neg is mounted, with different settings... With small film though, I stick to native aperture. Tyler aka "crunchy" http://www.custom- <http://www.custom-digital.com/> digital.com/ --- In DigitalBlackandWhit <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> eThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "john dean" <deanwork2003@...> wrote: > > That's very useful Bruce, regarding the opening up of the aperture to > reduce grain. There is a Gain setting with Silverfast that I'm using > but I never use it. > > One thing that I have noticed routinely with the Howtek when scanning > black and white film is that with my unit the scans are a bit over > sharpened at 4000 ppi, making them apper more grainy,esp 35mm tri-x. I > add a tad of gaussian blur and it is smoothed out. Increasing the > aperture in Silverfast would probably be a better method. I'll try it! > > Thanks. > > John > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Scan Resolution for a 4X5 Black and White Negatives
2008-09-23 by E Neilsen
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.