Hi Tina, > > ... far better solution in every way is Leica M lense on a Leica M8. > I really don't have very high expectations for a wide angle DSLR. My moving to the 5D2 is for the 90 TS, which gets me back the medium telephoto tilt combination that I so highly value(d) with my 150 Sonnar on the SL66 (which is heavy and does not do well with Tech Pan due to film flatness issues). The 90 TS is up to the job (Photozone: "Technically the lens is about as good as it gets ..."). Now the question is whether the new ff Canon is. We'll see. I expect to stick with the Bronica RF 645, 45 mm lens, and TP for serious wide angle shooting. However, I wanted some moderate wide angle for the 5D2 just as a practical complement the 90 for situations where I need hand held, fast shooting with more coverage. If it's too doggie, I'll stick with my 50 2.5 macro, which does at least very well on the Rebel. I expect rangefinders to dominate the wide side when it comes to image quality on digital cameras. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] DSLR sharp? -- was How tiny dots determine real resolution in a B&W ink prin
2008-09-29 by pr_roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.