Sorry but I’m going to make some simple statement here – beyond that you’ll have to ask others. The 17 stops are handled by the film and the way I process it prior it to going anywhere near a scanner. The scanner simply deals with scanning of a piece of film that has everything from clear film base through to dense areas of highlights. No real difference from anyone else’s negative film. It’s not a technical question - TIFF encoding doesn’t enter into it any more that it does for anyone else who scans their film. Steve From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Dana H. Myers Sent: 07 October 2008 21:40 To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: Subject Brightness Range - branch from [Digital BW] Re: Getting reasonable scan file sizes w/ MF & LF ... Steve Gledhill wrote: > > > Dana, > > Not many images have that range – but lately I’ve been photographing in > cathedrals where the deep interior shadows through to the sunlit stained > glass windows certainly have that challenge. So ... yes, I really do. .... and you really capture 17 stops of range in 16 bits? How do you technically achieve that? Isn't the TIFF encoding a linear value? In which case, I wouldn't expect more than 16 stops (at best) to be possible in the TIFF file, right? Dana [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: Subject Brightness Range - branch from [Digital BW] Re: Getting reasonable scan file sizes w/ MF & LF ...
2008-10-07 by Steve Gledhill
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.