Digital BW, The Print

But, anything over 16 can't be represented in a 16 bit tiff file.
�
TB


--- On Tue, 10/7/08, Steve Gledhill <stephengledhill@...> wrote:

From: Steve Gledhill <stephengledhill@...>
Subject: RE: Subject Brightness Range - branch from [Digital BW] Re: Getting reasonable scan file sizes w/ MF & LF ...
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, October 7, 2008, 1:31 PM






Dana,

Not many images have that range – but lately I’ve been photographing in cathedrals where the deep interior shadows through to the sunlit stained glass windows certainly have that challenge. So ... yes, I really do.

Steve Gledhill

www.virtuallygrey. co.uk <http://www.virtuall ygrey.co. uk/> 

From: DigitalBlackandWhit eThePrint@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhit eThePrint@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of Dana H. Myers
Sent: 07 October 2008 21:21
To: DigitalBlackandWhit eThePrint@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: Subject Brightness Range - branch from [Digital BW] Re: Getting reasonable scan file sizes w/ MF & LF ...

Steve Gledhill wrote:
> The next step requires the scanner to be able to scan high 
> density negatives – or more specifically, areas of high density – the 
> highlights. My Epson V700 does that for me. The scanner captures the 
> whole range from clear film base to the maximum density of the negative 
> and represents it in the TIFF file as a full range 16-bit greyscale 
> scan. So the huge SBR in the original scene is ‘compressed’ (via my 
> workflow) into the range my paper is capable of – i.e. maximum ink black 
> to paper white.

Do you really capture 17-stops of range using a 16-bit TIFF?

Dana 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 













[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]