Hi Jean- Marc; I've been using Qimage for color work for years, and you're right it is a confusing interface, and has gotten more so over the years. I use it primarily to throw several pix on one page with individual captions, something it does quite well. I would do some carefull upsizing comparisons before bothering with it-I'm not so sure any number of other programs aren't just as good, though having Qimage do it 'on the fly' is convenient. As for ABW-Qimage does not have its own driver, it uses the Epson driver, so you can still set it for ABW and either apply a profile through Qimage's color management. But honestly, unless you need the proofing/compositing features in Qimage,if you're getting first rate results, why bother? Steven Karafyllakis -- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@...m, "Jean-Marc Humbert" <humbertjm@...> wrote: > > Hi, > > I print with an Epson 3800 almost only B&W pics. > > Use for that the ABW Epson driver option (option: dark) (with a 51 > gray step .icc profile through Datacolour spectro, such profile being > applied with PS CS3 when I come to print and proof setup) on > Hahnemuhle Fine Art Peal and Fine Art Baryta (the latest being on the > top with brilliant darks). > > I read very positive opinions on Qimage (in particular for upsizing > the prints with a very high dpi ratio). > > What would be the advantages to switch to Qimage instead of using the > profiled Epson ABW driver as I do? (for upsizing I go with the addon > Alien Skin Blow Up). I print on A3+ and A2 papers. Is it possible to > keep ABW option and B&W profiling with Qimage (I downloaded the demo > Qimage, put it seems very confusing) > > Thank you for the input! > > Jean-Marc Humbert > Paris, France >
Message
Re: Advantage to use Qimage rather than ABW with an Epson 3800?
2008-10-12 by Steven Karafyllakis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.