Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: Qimage

2008-10-22 by c1asia

i totally agree!  great sharpening & interpolation algorithms.  but i
do wish they would leave it as a 16-bit TIFF so i can print it with
all 16-bits through a RIP.  qimage is not my last step.  i do some
other steps involving "add canvas" for customized borders and then
adding text to the borders.  yes, i know qimage can do borders but i
have different requirements for my borders.

i do hope future editions give me the option to NOT convert to 8-bits
because i would prefer to print through a RIP rather than through qimage.

mike, are you listening?



--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Alan Zimmerman"
<azimmerman1@...> wrote:
>
> I read with interest , the recent posts on Qimage.  and I too, echo
their excellent results .I am not a " volume user" but after trying a
number of sharpening plug-ins as well as the imbedded PS " sharpening"
menu, have concluded that Qimage offers superior results w/o looking
over sharpened. My prints just simply are more pleasing to my eye  and
the workflow is intuitive and ideal for my fine art and architectural
work.
> Alan Zimmerman
>    
>    
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.