i totally agree! great sharpening & interpolation algorithms. but i do wish they would leave it as a 16-bit TIFF so i can print it with all 16-bits through a RIP. qimage is not my last step. i do some other steps involving "add canvas" for customized borders and then adding text to the borders. yes, i know qimage can do borders but i have different requirements for my borders. i do hope future editions give me the option to NOT convert to 8-bits because i would prefer to print through a RIP rather than through qimage. mike, are you listening? --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Alan Zimmerman" <azimmerman1@...> wrote: > > I read with interest , the recent posts on Qimage. and I too, echo their excellent results .I am not a " volume user" but after trying a number of sharpening plug-ins as well as the imbedded PS " sharpening" menu, have concluded that Qimage offers superior results w/o looking over sharpened. My prints just simply are more pleasing to my eye and the workflow is intuitive and ideal for my fine art and architectural work. > Alan Zimmerman > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Re: Qimage
2008-10-22 by c1asia
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.