Didn't you have a big problem getting reasonable blacks just a day or two ago? Sounds like bad ink...when you say OEM "MK and PK" do you mean virginal Epson OEM carts or something non-standard... ? Using 2200 I've long been sold on Moab... loved the old Kayenta, (now Lasal Matte)...use that to proof Entrada Bright...and more often, Entrada Natural and Museo Portfolio Rag ( maybe +3C if I want totally neutral Natural and Rag...same as with HPR). +++ it seems to me there's literally no variation across those papers except for the obvious bright vs natural+++I've only used a few test sheets of Colorado Matte and lost them...can't comment on that paper except that I thought at the time that it was redundant with Entrada... Switching to glossy (& changing machines to R800), I use Moab Lasal Gloss and a remaining cache of old Costco Kirkland glossy interchangably...again, they seem tonally identical to Lasal Matte (Kayenta). My ultimate favorite fine paper is now Moab Colorado Satine Fiber...unfortunately nfg on 2200 because of gloss differential and bronzing... Satine is absolutely perfect with my $50 Ebay R800 test machine...I'm looking for a similarly cheap 1800 (same OEM carts). John --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Richard Smallfield <r.smallfield@...> wrote: > > Hi, > I've just started printing on Moab Colorado (and various RC papers for proofing) and am getting hues very different from what I'm used to with MK ink and matt papers. > > The setup is: Epson 2100, QTR, OEM PK, UC inks. > > >
Message
Re: QTR-UC PK prints v warm (2100)
2008-11-06 by djon43
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.