Michael King wrote: > On this topic you might be interested in a video interview with Wilhelm just > released here; > http://luminous-landscape.com/whatsnew/ Listened to the audio files and it is a nice summary of the issues. The RC papers could have been discussed a bit more thoroughly in my view, there are still questions to be answered there. I heard no real condemnation of digital RC papers in that interview. I have seen an estimation that RC papers structurally should last about 75 years so one shouldn't write them off too easily. Henry Wilhelm likes to refer to Fiber papers and isn't happy with the term barite for some of the papers. It isn't explained but my best guess is that the actual barite content varies a lot within the category. The main thing is that the Fiber papers try to give the air dried analogue photopaper look but they are not that related in their composition. I see on Wilhelm's pages that he tested both Harman Fiber qualities and Epson Exhibition Fiber Paper and the results are good. The HP Vivera pigment inks perform much better on the Harman qualities than the Canon and Epson pigment inks. A quick estimation says 2x the lifetime. Good to see that Hahnem\ufffdhle and Harman as third party paper manufacturers have independent testing done (again). -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Ernst | Dinkla Grafische Techniek | | www.pigment-print.com | | ( unvollendet ) |
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Archivability of Papers
2008-11-10 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.