Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Signing a matted print...

2002-02-11 by Martin Wesley

----- Original Message -----
From: "SKID Photography" <skid@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 12:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Signing a matted print...



(snip)
>
> Daniel,
> You should sign the print itself, whether it shows or not.  The point of
signing
> the print vs. the mat is that in the future, the mat might be changed and
no
> longer be part of the image.
>
> By signing the image itself you are 'authenticating' it.
>
> Harvey Ferdschneider
> partner, SKID Photography, NYC
>

Daniel,

I agree with Harvey and would suggest that in the future you mat your prints
so the white border, with your signature, can be seen.

As well as authenticating the print, a visible signature is an advertising
issue as well. If one of your prints is sold and displayed somewhere that is
not a museum or gallery with a little identifying card, the only chance the
viewer may have of knowing the name of the photographer is by reading his
signature. So make it visible and legible (I have a hard time with the
legible part!)!

Martin

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.