----- Original Message ----- From: "SKID Photography" <skid@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 12:19 AM Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Signing a matted print... (snip) > > Daniel, > You should sign the print itself, whether it shows or not. The point of signing > the print vs. the mat is that in the future, the mat might be changed and no > longer be part of the image. > > By signing the image itself you are 'authenticating' it. > > Harvey Ferdschneider > partner, SKID Photography, NYC > Daniel, I agree with Harvey and would suggest that in the future you mat your prints so the white border, with your signature, can be seen. As well as authenticating the print, a visible signature is an advertising issue as well. If one of your prints is sold and displayed somewhere that is not a museum or gallery with a little identifying card, the only chance the viewer may have of knowing the name of the photographer is by reading his signature. So make it visible and legible (I have a hard time with the legible part!)! Martin
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Signing a matted print...
2002-02-11 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.