Thanks, Greg, this is good information. I posted a reply from this other supplier stating that, yes, you are correct, WJ1082 is indeed Eboni. So, if I want to print BO in the 1400, then I don't need any other ink in the other cartridges. I think someone on this mailing list mentioned distilled water. I'll probably try this supplier's Claria replacements first; at least I'll be able to refill. I've just asked them about the archival characteristics of this Claria-replacement ink; the ink numbers are WJ1136, WJ2094, WJ6137, WJ7049, WJ2095, and WJ6138. Andrew On 02/19/2009 06:44 AM, Greg wrote: > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>, Andrew Sharpe > <asharpe@...> wrote: > >> >> I've asked him to verify that WJ1082 is indeed Eboni, but I have not yet >> heard back. It is a little odd that they seem to discourage Eboni (if >> that is what it is) in the 1400. >> >> Andrew >> > > Eboni is a MIS trade name to obfuscate the real origins, no one else > calls it that and MIS will try to side step the question if you ask > them, they will never flat out admit they are the same inks. Take my > word for it or don't, it's up to you. Paul will not comment on this so > as not to stress ties with MIS. I have no ties with MIS in fact they > have pissed me off several times in the past so I only deal with them > when I have no other choice, which is a couple steps above my status > with Media Street (now some other company). MIS does not like people > knowing who really makes there ink, that is why they hide the Image > Specialists pages. I may be wrong, but I think they may be required to > sell the IS inks to keep some of there deals working, which is why > they hide the info. This is also why I prefer to buy from the IS part > number, because I then know exactly what I will be receiving. MIS > could change Eboni tomorrow and it may not be as good, but the WJ1082 > will be the same until they stop making it. > > As far as the third party carts with Epson carts, I've read that you > must use either all third party or all Epson. The reason I found is > due to the chips, if the printer sees some real and some third party, > it stops. Since I have not tried any of these most recent printers, I > am not certain this is true, but it would not surprise me. > > Since the pigment inks and dye inks traditionally do not mix well, > then using Eboni (WJ1082) in a dye based printer along with the other > dye based inks may not be a good idea. The inks will mix on the > capping station and could produce a goo clogging the heads and > clogging the ink pump. Again I have not tried this, so I am not sure. > Paul may have mixed the two types of inks and may be able to give > better information. But as far as I know, it is still required to > flush dye based printers before switching them to pigment inks. Claria > is the only unknown since I just bought my first Claria based printer, > so I can't really comment on this either way. I probably will not mix > any Claria with the pigment inks that I have find to out what happens, > it's just something that I don't care to try. > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Status of Eboni 6?
2009-02-20 by Andrew Sharpe
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.