On Apr 6, 2009, at 6:31 PM, AlanScharf wrote: > I argue with my photographer friends that the PRINT is the > photograph, not the image seen on a computer. For me the print size > is a critical aesthetic consideration. The eye moves (slightly) > around a little computer image in an entirely different way that it > moves around a real print. > > Also, the junk surrounding the computer image, including the monitor > itself, pulls the image up to the plane of the monitor screen, > destroying the character of the photograph as a window to the beyond. > > Do any of you have opinions about prints vs screen images? For years photographers thought of the chrome (positive transparency, on a backlit light table) as the standard; and it was certainly unmatchable in any other format at the time, so saying "here is my glorious work, it will look lousy when you make photo prints of it, or send it to press" was a common photographer's viewpoint. With digital the version of an image thought of as "the real thing" has varied. For some, its what they see on the little LCD screen on the back of their camera, but thats mostly amateurs. For others, its the final print on paper, but thats mostly the printmakers. For those in between, its what they see on their own monitor, in which case I would suggest they get a very good, very large monitor, especially as digital files get larger! At this point in time, most of the people I work with consider the highbit adjusted image the "real thing" and the low bit TIFF they create from it for customers and print services as the unflexible derivative, good enough to print, but not deep enough to do much else to. So its getting to be Lightroom, as much as Photoshop, that they are viewing "the real thing" in... Personally, I see it both ways: as a fanatic printmaker, I consider the print the final artifact, and unprintable images (ones that just will never look as good in print as on screen) to be phantoms similar to the chrome-on-a-lightbox. On the other hand, my portfolio is not the big black box in the corner, its the images in my Lightroom library, and more people see my portfolio these days on an iPhone, than in print... so its a slippery slope. C. David Tobie Global Product Technology Manager Digital Imaging & Home Theater CDTobie@... ---------- Datacolor www.datacolor.com/Spyder3 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Prints versus screen images.
2009-04-07 by C D Tobie
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.