There are medium quality digital frames (which is what I mentioned being used in galleries), but nothing in the Eizo category. For that, the new Mac mini, with miniDVI and miniDisplayPort would be the ticket, to run a large display, or a large TV. Actually I just purchased one, to drive my home theater system, so I'll be testing it via both those outputs within the next few days. We'll see how my images look at 1180p on a 32 inch LCD TV in comparison to a 30" Cinema display. C. D. Tobie Global Product Technology Mngr. Digital Imaging & Home Theater Datacolor.com CDTobie@Datacolor.com On Apr 7, 2009, at 1:54 PM, James Irelan <james@...> wrote: > > On Apr 7, 2009, at 9:02 AM, C D Tobie wrote: > >> >> Thats rather like claiming you prefer vinyl records to CDs. >> > > > > > > There are audiophiles who still do. All things considered I am not > one of them, but I do hear the areas where vinyl is still superior. > (actually, making an apples and apples comparison between CD and vinyl > is quite difficult...) > > Ansel said that the print is the performance, and the print has always > been what has driven my interest in photography. At the same time, > things change, technologies change and emerge, and David, you're > probably the one to ask: Where do things stand with what I'd call a > high-end, high rez version of the little digital photo frames that > seem more of a novelty than anything else right now? In other words, > while I love prints, I also see that on a very good monitor, a back > lit image can be stunning, like looking at a transparency on a light > table, as has been mentioned. It would seem to me that a large screen > with, say, an Eizo quality, with a built-in hard drive, like an iMac, > thin, easily mountable on a wall with no additional computer, would be > a logical extension of what already exists. Anyone who has tried to > hang even a small collection of framed work knows how quickly finite > wall space disappears. Back lit images look great. The rotation of > images serves variety, so an entire collection could be displayed in > the space of one framed image. As I say, I know that small, modest- > quality versions of this exist, and it wouldn't surprise me if larger, > high-rez versisons, do, too. But I'm not aware of what the status of > them is. I could see them becoming as popular as flat screen tvs if > the price got similar, which of course a 20x24 or larger Eizo wouldn't > be today, at least... > > James > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other > resources as they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish > to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting > this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages > to keep them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed > from the membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital > B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be > removed from the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group > Owner and Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines” in > the Files section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE “OWNE > R” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL > NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, > CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DA > MAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE L > OSSES (EVEN IF THE “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, > THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH D > AMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIG > ITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTER > ATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF > ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) AN > Y OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Prints versus screen images.
2009-04-07 by Cdtobie
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.