I don't want to perpetuate this kind of dialogue either and shouldn't have responded the first time. The only reason I bothered to comment on that post was that it suggested that Cone was here (just like others) as a salesman primarily. I thought that comment was more than a tad insulting since he is a great black and white great print maker first with a lot of credibility to back it up, an innovator in THIS specific technology second, and a salesman down the line somewhere. And, when it comes to this territory of black and white inkjet imaging, not all "salesmen" are created equal. That is what was stated. j > That said, I find it childish and ego wagging to read about who > contributes the most and who "belongs here, and who doesn't".
Message
Re: Prints versus screen images.
2009-04-13 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.