Digital BW, The Print

You probably meant "non sequitur", similar to the disjointed universal conclusion you made in regard to your testing one for the type of work you do, and my need for one in the type of work I do. Nonetheless, you remind me of young Frankie McCourt during his postal position in Angela's Ashes. 

Pending any last word from you on the subject of transmissive spectros or nonsequeter/non sequitur, we can just kill the transmissive spectrophotometer topic-within-a-topic that should have been a new topic and my apologies to the moderator and other readers for my apparent abuse of topic comingling.

Jon



--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, C D Tobie <CDTobie@...> wrote:
>
> 
> On May 9, 2009, at 11:44 AM, Jon Cone wrote:
> 
> > I'm in the market for one. I thought to take the direct approach  
> > with you and just ask a simple question whether you sell  
> > transmissive spectros.
> 
> Given that nonsequeter, the answer is: no Datacolor does not sell 0/45  
> transmissive devices, though I've always had an interest in it. It  
> would certainly be possible to build one based on our current product,  
> but the market  for it is so  small, we have never been able to  
> justify it. Besides, for the type of work I have tested this for,  
> doing a reflective profile and editing as needed seems to be about as  
> effective as building a transmissive profile, making it even less  
> justifiable. But thanks for your interest.
> 
> C. David Tobie
> Global Product Technology Manager
> Digital Imaging & Home Theater
> CDTobie@...
> 
> 
>   ----------
> 
> 
> Datacolor
> www.datacolor.com/Spyder3
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>