Jon, Thank you for this information. Is the 2.5 you report for glossy using K only? It does not require composite to hit this number? OK, now that we know this K works fairly well with matte papers, is there any reason why it cannot be used with a color inkset such as K3 compatible? I would think all of the K3 printers would jump at the chance of using this black ink. If it is compatible with color inks, I might just try it out on my 2400. Regards. Shilesh --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Jon Cone" <jon@...> wrote: > > Depends upon the workflow. If you use a Piezography generated curve for QTR (which I make) - its quite complex and involves several inks... If you go your own, then its up to how you generate the black. > > MPS is a gloss compatible 100% pure pigment black - that I can get up to 2.5 on glossy with it and about 1.54 to 1.6 on Photo Rag depending upon Photo Rag batches... > > NK7 Matte black gets 1.64 to 1.68 on Photo Rag - so you give up about .10 > > regards, > > Jon Cone > Piezography > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "shileshjani" <janishilesh@> wrote: > > > > Has anybody used this "universal" inkset? I am interested in using the black ink for good Dmax on both matte and glossy papers. > > > > Or is the black ink Dmax generated by composite inks (not K) similar to Paul Roark's numerous approaches? > > >
Message
Re: Piezography MPS Black Ink Dmax
2009-06-15 by shileshjani
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.