--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "pr_roark" > At any rate, the 3D LK and LLK are neutralized versions of LK and LLK. That's for clarifying, this is where I was mistaken. Not really an issue though as for the moment I can continue to use the UT-3D warm LK/LLK I have in stock. If I run out, I would guess I can easily use standard warmer K3 LK/LLK and adjust the tone in QTR. Three remaining questions: 1) Are the densities of UT3D and K3 LK/LLKs comparable? 2) In a 1.5pl printer does a K3 setup (MK+LK+LLK) make any sense or is that overdone and would a K2 setup perform equally well in practice? 3) Again in a 1.5pl printer, what would be preferable: MK+LK or MK+LLK?If I look to your comments on the 1400-NC3 approach, I would expect MK+LLK. Thanks, Joost
Message
Re: UT-3D iso UT14 inks in an Epson 285?
2009-06-16 by Joost Horsten
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.