Hi, there are different versions of RAID. I can't remember the name for the version I was talking about, but this version stripes data across, say, five discs and ends up with performance from the scratch disk that is as fast as RAM - so you can end up with the performance equivalent 80GB of ram for photoshop. Amadou's book talks about this and a friend up the road, who has this setup, told me about the speed equivalence. r54[p-0 (The cat wrote that bit, but it looks very techy to me.) Richard At 01:50 a.m. Saturday 27/06/2009, you wrote: >I finally had someone straighten me out of RAID. As we all know, RAID >provides a second drive that mirrors the first drive in real time. The >issue is that if you totally screw-up a file and save it by mistake, RAID >will automatically mirror the screwed up file and you're left without a >backup. The better arrangement is a system of backup disks that backup >every hour or once a day or whatever time schedule that you want to >establish. Many folks have a primary drive backed up daily (or more often) >on a second drive and then a third drive that is kept offsite and backed up >once a month. Some also do DVD backups to be kept offsite. > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > ____________ www.richardsmallfield.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re:Hard Drive Activity
2009-06-26 by Richard Smallfield
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.