Martin and Group- Given the 50/50 email/web split of our membership, my advice is to stay where we are for now. I can't find a solution that has the features we need. The closest is to take a step back in time and become a USENET group... probably not a great idea. I, for one, would gladly contribute to a fund to remove the intrusive advertising. Yahoo is nuts...this whole episode has totally soured me on them as a company. The seem to have only AOL as a role model and at least AOL provides reliable web connections along with the annoyances <g>. Let us know if Yahoo ever responds... thanks, Tom O'Connell -- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Martin Wesley" <mwesley250@e...> wrote: > Tom, > > First of all thank you for spending so much time looking into this. To > answer Austin's question , a move is being considered because as the list > has grown in membership so has the Yahoo advertising. The advertising has > become particularly annoying to those who access the group directly with > their browser. > > To answer your major question, a quick review of the membership settings > indicate that there is about a 50/50 split between those who do and those > who don't receive the posts by e-mail or digest. So there really does need > to be both and the e-mail side needs to provide daily and weekly digests. > > On line access should provide the ability to view messages by date (my > personal method of checking the group) and by thread. We are also using the > Files, Bookmarks, Database and Polls features of the group homepage. > > I have a backup of all the posted messages on my computer as *.elm films and > a new site must be able to import all 9700 in mass and reconcile duplicate > file names. > > The other issue is that the hosting organization needs to be large, stable > and likely to be around a long time. Yahoo has it's faults but it does have > a huge amount of hardware and staff to keep it running and backed up. > > All together this is a very tall order. > > As far as running a forum goes, it has taken far more of my time than I > anticipated at the beginning. If you add to that the technical side of > setting up software, maintaining a server, do back-ups, etc. the time > investment would be huge. > > The best solution would be to get Yahoo to modify their advertising on line > either by persuasion. I have left voice mail with Yahoo and sent an e-mail > about purchasing the ad space. Hopefully I will get a reply as this would be > the easiest solution to our problems (assuming they don't want a huge sum of > money!) If we do pay for this it would need to be done by the members as one > of our founding principles is to be free of any connection to a company > involved in selling products for digital printing. > > Once again thank you for your research! > > Martin > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "tomoc" <tomoc@y...> > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y...> > Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 9:39 PM > Subject: [Digital BW] Update report on search for new forum home > > > > HI everyone- > > > > Thought I should give you all an update on my research on possible > > new homes for the list/forum. > > > > The first thing I am finding out is that it is important to know if > > we need to remain a "list" with web access or whether we want to > > become a true forum, a web based community without the mailing list. > > > > I personally have always used the web, finding the email either > > overwhelming (if individual emails) or confusing if digests (and not > > too timely), but I see from many comments that a lot of us are email > > list users. If this is to overcome the ad problem (as many have > > indicated), some of the homes I've found may be suitable...if "list" > > remeains important, there will only be one alternative. > > > > My view is that the technolgoy of DPReview and RobGalbraith.com are > > the best two platforms supporting content that is close enough to > > ours to consider a "merger". > > > > check them out, if you like: > > > > http://www.robgalbraith.com/ (click on enter forums) > > http://www.dpreview.com/ (click on forums) > > > > They both have a nice look and clean features that help you by > > threading and summarizing, etc. DP Review responded that they just > > wouldn't have time to transfer our archives. Rob Galbraith said the > > archives would only be possible to transfer to his server if they > > were importable to the Ultimat Bulletin Board infrastructure, which > > he thought was unlikely. > > > > I also checked with both the moderator and the membership of the > > Nikon D1 Users Group forum, a self hosted forum. I think we could > > work out a merger there...this is a terrific platform as well... but > > it does not support the mailing list. > > > > Check this one out: http://www.nikond1.net/ > > > > This left 2 alternatives that I am aware of. First would be to > > establish a USENET news group and this is a real possiblity. Google > > now has a very slick interface for newsgroup reading and responding. > > It's not quite as customized as Yahoo groups, but its fast, its free > > and there are no ads whatever. > > > > See an example of this: http://groups.google.com/groups? > > hl=en&group=rec.photo.digital (if this link doesn't work because > > it's on two lines, go to google groups and enter rec.photo.digital in > > the search box). > > > > Finally, a member of the Nikon D1 Users forum contacted me and > > expressed and interest in helping us start one from scratch "I have > > the server, the knowledge, and the connection. What I need is time to > > manage it. If you want to co-host it, we could probably put this > > together ourselves." > > > > I don't know if we have anyone here who has the time to step up and > > manage a forum (I don't even know how much time it would take). I > > assume this is not the case or we wouldn't be in Yahoo now??? > > > > There is one other option. It has been mentioned on the list. That > > would be to pay Yahoo not to be in an ad environment. I haven't > > checked out this cost. I would be willing to contribute to it, but > > this is probably something that would be "safer" for the list to be > > in some corporate hands. Maybe we should/could approach Epson or and > > ink or paper manufacturer to buy sponsorships? > > > > Well... looking forward to feedback and new direction... if any... > > > > Tom O'Connell > > TomOC@y... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and > other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > > - Include your full name with your message. > > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various > resources on the homepage. > > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Update report on search for new forum home
2002-02-14 by tomoc
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.