Hello, I used to have the 2200 printer and I did B&W printing from scanned negs and digital output. I was able to get acceptable B&W prints using the regular Epson inks for the 2200. You will never get fantastic B&W prints from the 2200 no matter what inks you use. They will be OK at best but you cant compare them to regular silver prints. I printed on many papers including Japanese Gampi tissue paper and the results are interesting but if you put a digital print next to a silver print you will choose the silver print in a second. I now have the Epson 3800 printer and I can say the same. Digital prints have a digital look to them. I can get some pretty good quality out of the 3800 but I would not sell an exhibition quality digital print for the same price I can sell a silver print. I am printing on the Epson silver fiber type digital media now and it still has that digital look to it. I have been printing silver prints for 30 years and I teach both digital and silver printing and it is clear that digital B&W printing has a way to go yet. If you use one of the glossy silver type digital papers they will have that bronzing look to them with the 2200. If you use a matt paper there will not be bronzing but you will have muddy shadow detail. One big problem with using the off brand inks is that the 2200 can have clogging problems. I have not used off brand inks in the 2200 because I found that the 2200 worked pretty well with the standard Epson inks. I was never really happy with digital B&W because of my silver background and I still am not that happy with the prints that I can do with the 3800. My students go ohh and ahh when I show them my digital B&W prints but the ohhs and ahhs stop when I show my silver prints at the same time. The silver prints blow away any digital print that I can do. There is no comparing the two types of prints. You must calibrate your monitor no matter what. Any of the spider type calibration units work fine. Get one in the 175.00 range. I hope that this is a help for you. Steve [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Probably another dumb question, But!
2009-09-03 by deandadin@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.