is it really what good????<G> It's darn tootin' good. Base hue similar to WillyT, textured but a bit less granular, gamut and densities in line with other good inkjet papers, no OBs, per the big H- "in compliance with DIN 6738, ISO 9706, ANSI Z 39.48-1992 are acid free with a pH value between 7.5 and 9.5, have been buffered against environmental pollution according to DIN 9706 with a 4% calcium carbonate (CaCO3) content." for what that's worth... Prints look nice, and more importantly, the paper was totally appropriate for this project, don't you think? In fact, given the work and intent, it seemed almost impossible to NOT use it... I had run some quick tests months ago, and John Dean convinced me to give it another try, thankfully. Bamboo is very nice too, slightly different look, perhaps a bit more gamut and dmax, and also "green", at least compared to many other papers... I'm not really the official printer, just for 2 of the shows, Daniel has been remarkably supportive and loyal and uses me when he has any say in the matter. I don't know how the other shows were produced. Tyler --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "faeofavalon" <faeofavalon@...> wrote: > > Hi gang - > > I just read about Hahnemuhle's new FineArt sugar cane paper and I am dying to try it. I love the bamboo. > > Tyler was mentioned in the article as being the official printer of the rainforest exhibit sponsored by Sony (if I read that correctly) and printed the 30 x 40 prints on the sugarcane paper. Tyler, is it really that good? Congratulations, by the way! That is some honor! > > AnnMarie > www.annmarietornabene.net >
Message
Re: Hahnemuhle and Tyler Boley
2009-10-07 by tboleyyh
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.