Antonis, As architects we have used HP printers for many years. I will tell you that they are build like tanks and require very little service. When I was considering the HP 5000 vs. the ESP 10000 a few months ago I opted to purchase the 10000 for a couple of reasons. First the quality of the HP 5000 is equal to the Epson 9000/9500. The Epson 10000 print qualty exceeds the HP 5000 and Epson 9000. Second, the HP 5000 does not have a straight through paper path. Using sheets like Hahnemuhle William Turner, Torchon, and German Etching Board is near impossible. Using roll paper becomes imperative. Sheets are too stiff and get runied in the 5000. The good part is that the HP LF inks are excellent. They have wonderful gamut, superior life with virtually no fade, and I hear metamerism is all but non-existent. I have a small HP 1280 desktop printer in the office. Believe it or not, I get a fairly neutral grayscale from this machine using color inks with no observable crossover. HP photo quality printer produce very smooth images. The neat thing about the 1280 is that when I get banding, it means the cartridge is about to run out of ink. I buy a new cartridge which comes with a new print head and away we go. HP desktop printers have the print head in the cartridge. Mike ----- Original Message ----- From: "antonisphoto" <antonisphoto@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 12:00 PM Subject: [Digital BW] Epson vs HP for fine art bw??? > Hello all, > > I just stumbled across the details for a Milton Greene exhibit in the UK. > Apparently these are bw ( and color ) prints that were printed on Hahnemuhle > papers (on whose site I read this). But the surprise is that they were done on > an HP printer. > > Are we too entrenched in the Epson camp to notice other printers? Does > anyone have pluses and minuses for HPs and other alternatives? > > Here is an excerpt: > >>>Having taken hours of digital retouching in some cases, Joshua Greene > has found a solution for outputting these prints onto Hahnemuhle Digital Fine > Art papers using the Hewlett Packard Designjet 5000PS printer, which with its > UV inks combined with the Hahnemuhle media will last up to 200 years, much > longer than a traditional photograph. > <<< > > more at: > http://www.hahnemuhle.com/ > under "news". > > Any thoughts? Nij?... > > Antonis > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Epson vs HP for fine art bw???
2002-02-16 by Michael Kravit
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.