You say "Raw gives you nothing." BUT, it DOES give you a lot more than JPG, so that is not a true statement. The person who decides to use RAW instead of JPG is the person who is more interested in producing a better image. Because of the ability of lightroom to compensate for poor exposure, they still get a better print, than with JPG. Then, that person will learn more about exposure than the person who insists on using JPG, as time passes, and do better in the future. Plus, because Lightroom does not modify the original JPG. Even if the camera they use only makes JPGs, as they learn about exposure or use Lightroom and their camera better, they can go back to produce better prints. Thus it is best to encourage everyone to use RAW if they possibly can. Get them to use it, and then teach them how to use it properly by leading them to the zone system. Ye Ol' Codger Bob ________________________________ From: E.Neilsen <e.neilsen2@...> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Sent: Mon, November 16, 2009 5:17:36 AM Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Re: photos by Jean-Michel Berts David, RAW is a format that allows for more information to be maintained but it gives you nothing in terms of exposure. If you screw up your exposure it is still screwed. The information hitting the sensor is of course maintained in the file and compared to a JPEG there is so much more to work with it is crazy not to use it, but I stand by my answer in that RAW gives you nothing, but rather you give yourself data to work with when you make a proper exposure and use a RAW processor. Eric Neilsen Eric Neilsen Photography 4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9 Dallas, TX 75226 www.ericneilsenphot ography.com skype me with ejprinter _____ From: DigitalBlackandWhit eThePrint@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhit eThePrint@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of C D Tobie Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 7:07 AM To: DigitalBlackandWhit eThePrint@ yahoogroups. com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: photos by Jean-Michel Berts On Nov 15, 2009, at 10:07 PM, E.Neilsen wrote: > RAW does not give you anything. Actually RAW gives you high bit, which is the whole value of it. But if there is a high bit file behind the visible veil of 8 bits per channel (all that you can actually see of any file, high bit or not), then its the adjustments you can make to the RAW, high bit file, without it breaking up as an 8 bit per channel file will, that is the value of RAW. So yes, HDR-like capabilities are one form of taking advantage of RAW; as is opening the shadows and finding more shadow detail instead of just noise, or salvaging highlights without creating problems elsewhere. So I'd suggest your answer is also so close to false as to be incorrect.. ;-) C. David Tobie Global Product Technology Manager Digital Imaging & Home Theater CDTobie@datacolor. <mailto:CDTobie% 40datacolor. com> com ---------- Datacolor www.datacolor. com/Spyder3 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: photos by Jean-Michel Berts
2009-11-16 by Robert Johnston
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.