Terry, Your readings that 100% patch has highest measured density is unusual. I don't have any experience with your inkset, so that may be it. Another quick check worth considering. Are you printing the QTR calibration chart at 100% ink limits? Shilesh --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Terry" <TerryGls@...> wrote: > > Thanks Eric, > > My 70% densitometer reading on the Harman Crystaljet is 2.34. My readings for Epson Ultra Premium Luster are 100% - 2.53, 70% - 2.2, and at 60% - 2.05. > > On the Epson Luster I'd say the the 60% ink square visually looks as dark as the 100% ink square. Basically the same as the Crystaljet paper. > > So if an ink density of around 2.1 or 2.2 is an "acceptable black" to the eye, Why do we need to push for higher Dmax ink/papers (speaking of luster/semi-gloss, etc papers)? > > Terry > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "E.Neilsen" <e.neilsen2@> wrote: > > > > Terry, When printing out to 100%, you are trying to determine just how much > > ink can go down on a piece of paper. Since the dmax doesn't change with more > > ink, you stop using the ink. Why, too much can allow bleeding that causes > > images to lose sharpness. What does your 70% read? Different ink sets, > > different amounts, different printers different ink amounts. The curves > > posted or starting points. we all have are own set of perfect numbers and > > preferred looks and controls. > > > > > Eric Neilsen> > > Eric Neilsen Photography> > > 4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9> > > Dallas, TX 75226> > > > > www.ericneilsenphotography.com > > > > skype me with ejprinter> _____ > > > > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Terry > > Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 12:40 PM > > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: [Digital BW] Maximum Usable Black vs. Dmax - What's the Big Deal?> > > > > As I understand when printing out the Ink Separation Page in QTR, the Photo > > Black (PK) or Matte Black ink (MK) at 100% is the maximum black. Yet > > visually, on most Luster/Pearl/Semi-glossy papers, the 55, 60, or 65% ink > > square is as black looking as the 100%. > > > > For example, when I measure the 100% PK ink square on Harman Crystaljet > > Luster RC paper, printed with Epson inks on my R800 / R1800 with my > > densitometer I get 2.64. The 60% black measures 2.13 yet visually looks as > > black as the 100%. The 60% is typically chosen to create the QTR profile yet > > the maximum density achievable is never really used. This general > > relationship is the same for all Luster/Pearl/Satin/Semi-gloss papers I've > > tested. > > > > Yet for the inherent difference between Luster & Matte papers what is the > > "big deal" about high Dmax and can you really use the 100% in creating a > > profile? > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Maximum Usable Black vs. Dmax - What's the Big Deal?
2009-11-24 by shileshjani
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.