Aurora Natural Lab L = 16.65 - 17 with QTR, 7800, & Eboni. That's 1.65 - 1.64. I have not worked with enough batches to know what to expect with respect to variances among the batches. Paul www.PaulRoark.com --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "met.graphix" <metgraphix@...> wrote: > > > > I've had a box sitting around here for a while and got hold of it a couple of days ago to create some QTR profiles. I was surprised at the dmax I'm getting (or lack thereof). 1.55 seem to be the best I can get with ebony. I used it in the past (in roll) and I seem to remember I was getting better values than this. What kind of numbers do other people get? > > Dario > > > > I've been looking for a non-OBA paper to use with a mix of HP PK and Eboni for my more neutral printing. (I'm moving away from all OBAs.) The Aurora Natural looks like a real bargain. Here are the relative costs of some papers for 13x19 sheets: > > > > Aurora Natural -- $1.34, > > > > Arches watercolor -- $1.70, > > > > Alise Natural -- $2.24, > > > > Premier Art 325 -- $2.75. > > > > The Aurora N actually seems to have the lowest Lab B of the group, which is a positive factor for my use. The Aurora is on the thin side (13 mils) but it's thicker than the 200 gsm paper I've used with good results. > > > > Does anybody have any bad news relating to Aurora Natural? It seems like a bargain. > > > > Paul > > www.PaulRoark.com > > >
Message
Re: Red River Aurora Natural
2010-02-02 by pr_roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.