Additionally, metamerism failure is a fact of life, and basically a matter of degree. It also exists in carbon only ink prints (which is still a a mythical object whose existence is somewhat suspect), but is more subjectively easier to live with than some of the more pronounced examples done with older inksets or inadequate GCR schemes. I print monochrome a variety of ways, with a variety of inks, and after years of concern now see it everywhere to some degree. It's called physics. Tyler http://www.custom-digital.com/ --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, C D Tobie <CDTobie@...> wrote: > > > On Feb 3, 2010, at 4:10 PM, Dave wrote: > > > The idea of an all-carbon approach appeals to me. The most appealing > > aspect of it is the lack of illuminant metameric failure. From what > > I've read here, the color of all-carbon ink doesn't change with the > > light. > > True, but there is no visible metamerism in AWB, or even in Color Mode > neutral prints on any of my Canon, HP, or Epson inkjets that use > multiple grays in the OEM inksets, so that is not actually a reason > for going carbon. > > C. David Tobie > Global Product Technology Manager > Digital Imaging & Home Theater > CDTobie@... > > > ---------- > > > > Datacolor > www.datacolor.com/Spyder3 > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Brown Tones w/ Carbon inks
2010-02-03 by tboleyyh
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.