"Mark" <mark@...> wrote: > ... > The technical part of my job is ... well under control. > However, the "marketing" part ... may be the bigger challenge! > The public has been mentally conditioned ... to expect print longevity ratings expressed as a single "years of life" rating I think "Years on Display" is simple and conveys some comparative information, even if not very complete. To fit into their model, I think Mark's AaI "Years on Display" conversion table is like a Rosetta Stone in terms of connecting the test results to Wilhelm's and specific types of environments. For easier access, I've exerted the Aai conversion table here: http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/AaI-Display-Years-Conversion.pdf I've added a green underline to help show, as an example, where we're at with the recently released 30 MLux Hours test, but in "Wilhelm years": 30 MLux Hrs = 15 "Years on Display." What really got my attention was that it's only 3.4 years of commercial gallery display. The AaI list of tests is at http://www.aardenburg-imaging.com/cgi-bin/mrk/_4346c2hvd19kb2NfbGlzdC80. The blue ones are public. A conversion table is on page 4 of these tests, for example, the Canon Lucia on Innova F-type, which is where the excerpted table is found. > ... any specific print can last seconds or it can last centuries depending on the storage, handling, and display circumstances... Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Aardenburg-Imaging 30 MLux Hr results
2010-02-11 by pr_roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.