Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Beginners questions

2010-03-16 by Lew

Yes, but the grain and/or noise introduced by the scan seems to be way more noticeable than in a wet print from the same negative. Also, I'm not interested in re interpreting my negs. I want the inkjet prints to look as much like the wet prints as possible.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave <cowcreekroad@...>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:21:49 
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Beginners questions

If you've shot mostly 35, why not embrace the grain rather than fight  
it?
IMO, grain is what makes 35mm, 35mm.


On Mar 16, 2010, at 12:05 PM, Lew wrote:

> The main & perhaps impossible problem I face is years & years of Tri- 
> X & HP5 in D76 & related soups.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.