Re: inkjetcarts -> image-specialist ink?
2010-05-05 by shileshjani
Daniel, I have read some place that the MIS ink is also from Image Specialists. I have used the inkjetcarts.us inks, but not the full range of K4 inks. I use
Messages
Browse messages
Page 188 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
inkjetcarts -> image-specialist ink?
2010-05-05 by bostonphotomaker
Has anyone used the ink that inkjetcarts sells? They say it s from www.image-specialists.com. I m interested in replacement inks for Epson K3. I ve tried the
Re: refillable cartridges - differences?
2010-05-05 by hp9180profile
... Not wide format carts but I purchased a few sets for my 1800 from ebay and they were absolute rubbish. They ALL leaked. I then tried
Re: [Digital BW] Re: refillable cartridges - differences?
2010-05-04 by Rudy Ternbach
I ve used Cone refillable cart s exclusively in my 4800 and 1400. There has rarely been an issue with them and if there was an issue they gave immediate
Re: refillable cartridges - differences?
2010-05-04 by mojojones2001
Thanks for the answers. Has anyone used the cheap ebay units? They re about half the cost. Thanks, J.
Re: [Digital BW] refillable cartridges - differences?
2010-05-03 by john
I have both the MIS and the Cone refillable carts for the 9600 and older printers and they both have worked perfectly for me but I turn my chip reading on the
Re: [Digital BW] refillable cartridges - differences?
2010-05-03 by Patrick Kealey
I use cone color refillable in my 3800, compared to what OEM would be I save a lot of $$, customer service is good. I use the vivid and have had to profile
Re: [Digital BW] refillable cartridges - differences?
2010-05-03 by Mark Savoia
I have been happy with MIS carts. Mark http://www.stillrivereditions.com
refillable cartridges - differences?
2010-05-03 by mojojones2001
Hello All, I looking into getting refillable cartridges for my 4800 and Possibly 7600 as well. Is there really any difference in the ones available? The
Low tech question
2010-05-03 by Rudy Ternbach
To calibrate, I was always told, is to measure and adjust the accuracy of an instrument against a standard. To linearize, in my understanding, is to plot
Re: [Digital BW] Re: B/W options for 11880?
2010-05-03 by R Craig Blackman
I am in agreement with you, Walker. Craig ________________________________ From: Walker Blackwell To: Walker Blackwell
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Low tech question
2010-05-03 by Bob Frost
... Linearization may have nothing whatsoever to do with printers or calibration! I can linearize a curve in a graph, for example. ... That would seem a
Re: Low tech question
2010-05-03 by Paul
... Thanks, Paul... I ll print it out and add it to my notebook. Paul
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Low tech question
2010-05-03 by Michael King
... not linearize . Not really, linearization is just a subset of calibration and is the correct term for this activitiy. I calibrate my monitor and my
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Low tech question
2010-05-03 by Bob Frost
... Another example where calibrate would be the more accurate description, not linearize . Bob F. ... From: pr_roark
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Low tech question
2010-05-03 by Bob Frost
... See what I mean? This use of linearize actually means calibrate! Bob Frost. ... From: Leslie Otterbein
Linearize (Very Basic) Was Low tech question
2010-05-03 by shileshjani
Susan, I will attempt the most simple explanation: (1) The whitest that can be achieved in a print is bare paper; where there is no ink at all. This is known
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Low tech question
2010-05-03 by C D Tobie
... space used within sRGB, correct? Very close, but not identical... C. David Tobie Global Product Technology Manager Digital Imaging and Home Theater
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Low tech question
2010-05-03 by Terry Ritz
... Just to ensure I have this right, Gray Gamma 2.2 is also the gray working space used within sRGB, correct? Terry.
Re: Low tech question
2010-05-03 by pr_roark
... It s a typo -- wrong year. Feb. 2010 is the last edit. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Re: Low tech question
2010-05-03 by Paul
... I certainly don t want to sound picky but I looked at the pdf at that link above and it s dated 2-09. I downloaded a pdf from what must have been on your
Low tech question
2010-05-02 by Rudy Ternbach
Reminds me of the argument between the two logicians--one of whom, I believe, was an egg.... When I use a word, Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful
Re: Low tech question
2010-05-02 by pr_roark
... See the graph on page 11 of http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/Eb1400.pdf We use 21-step (usually) test files to print test strips and then measure the Lab L
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Low tech question
2010-05-02 by Leslie Otterbein
Hi Susan: To Linearize: To match the output of a device to the imput values. ie in Offset printing, if you can duplicate the screen (percentage) values in a
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Low tech question
2010-05-02 by Michael King
Susan, So the answer to your question; ... the ... Create_icc.exe ... Yes. Linearise just means to tweak data so that it s linear. You do that inside QTR for
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Low tech question
2010-05-02 by Bob Frost
... The problem may be that the word linearize is used in different ways by different people, just as metamerism is commonly used to mean different things.
Re: Low tech question
2010-05-02 by slcphoto73
I ve asked, and asked, also in the QTR forum and I don t know how many other places, but no one answers a simple question - what do you mean by linearize ? -
Re: Low tech question
2010-05-01 by pr_roark
... (Probably too much.) I usually have a paper/handout for the Golden Trout photo workshop that goes over workflows as well as the inks I m using. The 2009
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Low tech question
2010-05-01 by Phil Morse
-- Phil
[Digital BW] Re: Low tech question
2010-05-01 by Paul
Thanks for the link to that QTR workflow pdf, Mike, I ve printed it out and am studying it. That s a new source of information for me! Regards, Paul
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Low tech question
2010-05-01 by Michael King
So firstly you are better off asking straight QTR questions over on the QTR forum.... more people to help you and if you follow that forum postings you will
Re: Low tech question
2010-05-01 by Paul
Susan, I agree. I wish there were some of tutorial and/or glossary available here. I ve looked at the Files menu here but it s rather sparse and a bit dated.
Re: Low tech question
2010-04-29 by slcphoto73
... Oh, please, does this finally answer a question I have had for a long time that keeps me from wanting to use QTR -- *** does linearize mean the same
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Low tech question
2010-04-29 by Walter Oliver
Thanks for pointinge in the right, direction, gentlemen. After I get a look at those two sites, I ll come back and look at what linearize means! Walter On
Re: Low tech question
2010-04-29 by voranado
Thanks Shilesh, I still have a lot to learn with ABW. Don t I need a spectrometer to linearize papers? Steve
Re: Low tech question
2010-04-29 by voranado
Thanks Tyler. I have used QTR in the past with a number of inks, but printing irregularly settled on the 2400 with K3. It sounds like it is worth
Re: [Digital BW] Online Photo Books
2010-04-28 by Andrew Sharpe
So, who has a downloadable offline program that works in Linux? Anyone? Or, better stated, who has a decent enough web interface that they don t *need* an
[Digital BW] Re: Low tech question
2010-04-28 by shileshjani
Walter, Peruse this first: http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm There are 4 things to using ABW, and each can be sensitive to the paper you use; so they will
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Low tech question
2010-04-28 by Phil Radlick
Walter this might be a good start. http://people.csail.mit.edu/ericchan/dp/Epson3800/printworkflow.html Best, Phil From:
Re: Low tech question
2010-04-28 by tboleyyh
Sounds like you are assuming you will need to be able to profile to use QTR? Not the case. QTR is plug and play, as long as you use a paper supported for your
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Low tech question
2010-04-28 by Walter Oliver
Anyone know where can we find a good tutorial on how to use ABW effectively? Thanks, Walter Epson R2880 On Apr 28, 2010, at 4:35 PM, shileshjani
Re: Low tech question
2010-04-28 by shileshjani
Steve, Depends on what look you are after. Is there anything particular that you find lacking in ABW prints? QTR will give you much greater versatility,
Re: [Digital BW] Re: B/W options for 11880?
2010-04-28 by Ernst Dinkla
... There are linearisation targets in ColorPort, if you strip out the CMY patches you get what you want I think. -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Ernst Try:
Low tech question
2010-04-28 by voranado
Given that I do not create my own profiles, is there any advantage to using QTR rather than the Epson ABW print driver with stock K3 inks on a 2400? Steve
Re: [Digital BW] Re: B/W options for 11880?
2010-04-28 by Walker Blackwell
Eric. Can you send me your lab values from the validation target using your neutralize input icc? You re probably right where you need to be to start toning.
Re: [Digital BW] Re: B/W options for 11880?
2010-04-28 by Walker Blackwell
My way of thinking about all this is whatever works. SP handles input profiles in weird ways. PS converts and handles (assumed) working spaces (vs actual
Re: [Digital BW] Online Photo Books
2010-04-28 by John Labovitz
... I think Lulu gives you several options for the cover design. You *can* do the entire cover design yourself, but you have to choose that option, and
Re: [Digital BW] Re: B/W options for 11880?
2010-04-28 by Walker Blackwell
I think you can do this with Argyll. Do some google searches. Walker ... Walker Blackwell 802.821.4451 www.walkerblackwell.com aim: greendirtblues
Re: [Digital BW] Online Photo Books
2010-04-28 by faeofavalon
I thought this got posted but maybe not. It s been covered but I have used both blurb and lulu. lulu did a horrible job on print quality and the cover was an
Re: [Digital BW] Online Photo Books
2010-04-28 by R Craig Blackman
Let me add to this: I have had tremendous support from MyPublisher. I drove them crazy trying to get my book out. Finally, I was successful and I was delighted