Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

paper quandary

paper quandary

2011-05-06 by Paul

For several years I've been using PremierArt Smooth Fine Art 205 with good success but today when I went to Atlex to re-order I was told it was discontinued. Then I tried InkjetArt and was told the same thing. The guy at InkjetArt was very helpful however and suggested I try Moab Entrada Natural. It comes in a 190 weight which might be a tad too light in weight... the 205 was pretty light itself. 

As for color of the base, would those two papers be about the same? I just received a goodly supply of Crescent #2299 matte board which was a good match for the PremierArt so I hope the Entrada would match up  well also.

I use an R1800 with the 3MK setup and was happy to see QTR has profiles for Entrada Natural, so no problems there.

Re: paper quandary

2011-05-06 by Paul

PS One other issue: I have PremierArt Fine Art in test at Aardenburg, and would hate to start over again with a new paper. I'm at the 50 Megalux-hours point in the process with very good results so far. I should think results would be similar. Any thoughts there?

Thanks everyone,

Paul

Re: [Digital BW] Re: paper quandary

2011-05-06 by john eckenrode

I am pretty sure (99.9%) that Epson Scrapbook Matte is the same paper.
This stuff:
http://www.atlex.com/cgi-bin/commerce.cgi?preadd=action&key=SCR1002



________________________________
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Paul <paulmwhiting@...>
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 6, 2011 1:32 PM
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: paper quandary


  
PS One other issue: I have PremierArt Fine Art in test at Aardenburg, and would hate to start over again with a new paper. I'm at the 50 Megalux-hours point in the process with very good results so far. I should think results would be similar. Any thoughts there?

Thanks everyone,

Paul


 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Digital BW] Re: paper quandary

2011-05-06 by Paul

Thanks, John, I'm quite sure you're correct. I have used that in the past, and it is indeed the same as the PremierArt Fine Art. In fact, the fine print on the Scrapbook carton says something like "made for Epson by PremierArt". 

Problem is, it doesn't come in 11x19 size.I may go ahead and order some to tide me over... but sooner or later I'll want to resume making the larger prints.

Thanks for your thoughts!

Paul

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, john eckenrode <ejohn182002@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> I am pretty sure (99.9%) that Epson Scrapbook Matte is the same paper.
> This stuff:
> http://www.atlex.com/cgi-bin/commerce.cgi?preadd=action&key=SCR1002
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Paul <paulmwhiting@...>
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Friday, May 6, 2011 1:32 PM
> Subject: [Digital BW] Re: paper quandary
> 
> 
> Â  
> PS One other issue: I have PremierArt Fine Art in test at Aardenburg, and would hate to start over again with a new paper. I'm at the 50 Megalux-hours point in the process with very good results so far. I should think results would be similar. Any thoughts there?
> 
> Thanks everyone,
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
>  
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Re: paper quandary

2011-05-07 by john

My test of the Premier Art bright white paper submitted to Aardenburg deteriorated rapidly with two different tests. It was amazing how poor it held up. Those have to be some of the poorest obas ever created. I was shocked.

john




--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <paulmwhiting@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> PS One other issue: I have PremierArt Fine Art in test at Aardenburg, and would hate to start over again with a new paper. I'm at the 50 Megalux-hours point in the process with very good results so far. I should think results would be similar. Any thoughts there?
> 
> Thanks everyone,
> 
> Paul
>

Re: paper quandary

2011-05-07 by Paul

I'm sorry to hear that, John. I neglected to make clear that I was using the PremierArt Fine Art paper which had no OBA's. So far it's doing quite well.

Paul

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "john" <deanwork2003@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> My test of the Premier Art bright white paper submitted to Aardenburg deteriorated rapidly with two different tests. It was amazing how poor it held up. Those have to be some of the poorest obas ever created. I was shocked.
> 
> john
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <paulmwhiting@> wrote:
> >
> > PS One other issue: I have PremierArt Fine Art in test at Aardenburg, and would hate to start over again with a new paper. I'm at the 50 Megalux-hours point in the process with very good results so far. I should think results would be similar. Any thoughts there?
> > 
> > Thanks everyone,
> > 
> > Paul
> >
>

Re: paper quandary

2011-05-07 by Paul

"john" <deanwork2003@...> wrote:
>
> My test of the Premier Art bright white paper submitted to Aardenburg deteriorated rapidly with two different tests. ...

Which papers or test numbers were those?  I can't seem to find them.  Is it possible you were thinking of the Alise BW?

Thanks,

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

Re: paper quandary

2011-05-07 by john

Yes the Premier Alise with whiteners (not the much duller "natural" version). The Alise was not that white, it was very comparable to Photorag 308 in brightenss, and not a super bright cold paper at all, but it fell apart fast. In the two tests between 6-8 megalux hours, which is 3-4 Wilhelm Years. That is worse than anything I've ever seen. 

john



--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <roark.paul@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> "john" <deanwork2003@> wrote:
> >
> > My test of the Premier Art bright white paper submitted to Aardenburg deteriorated rapidly with two different tests. ...
> 
> Which papers or test numbers were those?  I can't seem to find them.  Is it possible you were thinking of the Alise BW?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
>

Re: paper quandary

2011-05-07 by Paul

"john" <deanwork2003@...> wrote:
>
> ... the Premier Alise with whiteners ... fell apart fast. ...

It would be nice to know more about whiteners.

Looking at a small sample of Aardenburg-Imaging test results, mostly from the  highly brightened category, the following tends to support what you've observed.


Paper: 		Start Lab B,	10 MLuxHrs, 	50 MLuxHrs

Alise: 		-3.1,		-0.3		0.8

Epson Prem PPM	-4.4		-2.5		0.6

Fuji DL 400 Mat -7.7		-8.1		-7.0

Br'g Color Velv -2.1		-2.7		-0.2

Eps Exh Fiber	-5.0		-3.4		1.6


H Photo Rag	0.9		-0.1		0.8

HPR is obviously not from the highly brightened category, but it has always impressed me with its lack of warming -- possibly balancing the fading of the brighteners with the bleaching  of the paper  base.


I suppose  ultimately the paper base color  will be where the image white ends up.  But if  that paper itself has been brightened, then we might not be  able to tell what the underlying paper  Lab B is.

The information in Ernst's paper database would be interesting to correlate with how long the papers will stay bright.

In  wonder how Fuji manages to keep it's DL 400 matte paper so bright for so long.  I tend to think Fuji knows a  lot about dyes and chemistry.  Maybe they've come up with a Claria-quality brightener dye.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

Re: paper quandary

2011-05-07 by john

Absolutely. Optical brighteners or whiteners are not all created equal as we have learned. Hahnemuhle, although still using traditional "dye" brighteners in small quantities in the manufacture of many of their papers like Photo Rag (not on the surface of the coating as in a lot of Epson papers) are holding up quite well and we have whole lot of samples to compare with all kinds of inks and PR was one of the first to be tested.

I have switched over the Canson paper for many of my surfaces though, that are quite a bit whiter, and in all their high-end matte papers are not dye obas but pigments, so it is said. We are waiting to see if this stability pans out over time. It seems like Mark was more concerned about them actually bleaching whiter than staining to yellow as most obas do. We'll see.

The really interesting thing to me is how quickly the Epson Exhibiton Fine Art is burning out in the high values, so much for Wilhelm's ratings. Since this is the same paper as the Innova Fiber Gloss I stay away from it now also. I never did trust that bluish stuff and now I know for sure. 

Kind if interesting that no one is using pigment whiteners in fiber gloss media. I don't understand that. Even Canson isn't. Most companies, including them, are offering a non-whitened and a whitened version of everything.Maybe gloss white pigments are difficult to deal with, must be.

john

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <roark.paul@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> "john" <deanwork2003@> wrote:
> >
> > ... the Premier Alise with whiteners ... fell apart fast. ...
> 
> It would be nice to know more about whiteners.
> 
> Looking at a small sample of Aardenburg-Imaging test results, mostly from the  highly brightened category, the following tends to support what you've observed.
> 
> 
> Paper: 		Start Lab B,	10 MLuxHrs, 	50 MLuxHrs
> 
> Alise: 		-3.1,		-0.3		0.8
> 
> Epson Prem PPM	-4.4		-2.5		0.6
> 
> Fuji DL 400 Mat -7.7		-8.1		-7.0
> 
> Br'g Color Velv -2.1		-2.7		-0.2
> 
> Eps Exh Fiber	-5.0		-3.4		1.6
> 
> 
> H Photo Rag	0.9		-0.1		0.8
> 
> HPR is obviously not from the highly brightened category, but it has always impressed me with its lack of warming -- possibly balancing the fading of the brighteners with the bleaching  of the paper  base.
> 
> 
> I suppose  ultimately the paper base color  will be where the image white ends up.  But if  that paper itself has been brightened, then we might not be  able to tell what the underlying paper  Lab B is.
> 
> The information in Ernst's paper database would be interesting to correlate with how long the papers will stay bright.
> 
> In  wonder how Fuji manages to keep it's DL 400 matte paper so bright for so long.  I tend to think Fuji knows a  lot about dyes and chemistry.  Maybe they've come up with a Claria-quality brightener dye.
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
>

Re: paper quandary

2011-05-07 by tboleyyh

unfortunately the non-brightened Alise version has never been submitted. It's an economical and nice paper and would have been the go to version for some inksets that benifit from a colder coating reaction. Oddly, the brightened version Epson hot and cold press seem to be doing pretty well in terms of brightener burn off. By the way, it turns out these papers are not rebranded Alise as I suspected, even though they look and perform remarkable similar.

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "john" <deanwork2003@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Absolutely. Optical brighteners or whiteners are not all created equal as we have learned. Hahnemuhle, although still using traditional "dye" brighteners in small quantities in the manufacture of many of their papers like Photo Rag (not on the surface of the coating as in a lot of Epson papers) are holding up quite well and we have whole lot of samples to compare with all kinds of inks and PR was one of the first to be tested.
> 
> I have switched over the Canson paper for many of my surfaces though, that are quite a bit whiter, and in all their high-end matte papers are not dye obas but pigments, so it is said. We are waiting to see if this stability pans out over time. It seems like Mark was more concerned about them actually bleaching whiter than staining to yellow as most obas do. We'll see.
> 
> The really interesting thing to me is how quickly the Epson Exhibiton Fine Art is burning out in the high values, so much for Wilhelm's ratings. Since this is the same paper as the Innova Fiber Gloss I stay away from it now also. I never did trust that bluish stuff and now I know for sure. 
> 
> Kind if interesting that no one is using pigment whiteners in fiber gloss media. I don't understand that. Even Canson isn't. Most companies, including them, are offering a non-whitened and a whitened version of everything.Maybe gloss white pigments are difficult to deal with, must be.
> 
> john
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <roark.paul@> wrote:
> >
> > "john" <deanwork2003@> wrote:
> > >
> > > ... the Premier Alise with whiteners ... fell apart fast. ...
> > 
> > It would be nice to know more about whiteners.
> > 
> > Looking at a small sample of Aardenburg-Imaging test results, mostly from the  highly brightened category, the following tends to support what you've observed.
> > 
> > 
> > Paper: 		Start Lab B,	10 MLuxHrs, 	50 MLuxHrs
> > 
> > Alise: 		-3.1,		-0.3		0.8
> > 
> > Epson Prem PPM	-4.4		-2.5		0.6
> > 
> > Fuji DL 400 Mat -7.7		-8.1		-7.0
> > 
> > Br'g Color Velv -2.1		-2.7		-0.2
> > 
> > Eps Exh Fiber	-5.0		-3.4		1.6
> > 
> > 
> > H Photo Rag	0.9		-0.1		0.8
> > 
> > HPR is obviously not from the highly brightened category, but it has always impressed me with its lack of warming -- possibly balancing the fading of the brighteners with the bleaching  of the paper  base.
> > 
> > 
> > I suppose  ultimately the paper base color  will be where the image white ends up.  But if  that paper itself has been brightened, then we might not be  able to tell what the underlying paper  Lab B is.
> > 
> > The information in Ernst's paper database would be interesting to correlate with how long the papers will stay bright.
> > 
> > In  wonder how Fuji manages to keep it's DL 400 matte paper so bright for so long.  I tend to think Fuji knows a  lot about dyes and chemistry.  Maybe they've come up with a Claria-quality brightener dye.
> > 
> > Paul
> > www.PaulRoark.com
> >
>

Re: paper quandary

2011-05-08 by Paul

"john" <deanwork2003@...> wrote:
>
> ...
> I have switched over the Canson paper for many of my surfaces ... and in all their high-end matte papers are not dye obas but pigments, so it is said.


Do they state that on their web page or elsewhere?  I've never seen that claim.  It could be very interesting if true (as opposed to what some salesman says at a booth).

>... It seems like Mark was more concerned about them actually bleaching whiter than staining to yellow as most obas do.

I think the approach I'd like to see more of is balancing the paper bleaching with an OBA that fades at the same rate.  I called the ink version of this a "counter-fade" strategy when I incorporated  the concept in the original MIS FSN inkset.  HP may use it in their neutral inks -- at least it appears in their patent disclosures.  I think H Photo Rag gets its stability from such an approach also.

> 
> ... so much for Wilhelm's ratings.

Like the Epson "Archival" 7500 inks -- just ignore the black end with its hybrid pigment-dye K and it looks a lot better.  Wilhelm has contributed a lot to the field, but to really know what is going on, we need the details.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

Re: paper quandary

2011-05-08 by john

He will correct me if I am wrong but I believe Mark was the one that pointed out the differences between dye obas and the new pigment whiteners. Breathing Color also uses a similar whitener in their canvas products evidently.

Canson has never stated what they ARE in print other than saying they have no oba content. That is with their matte papers.

john



--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <roark.paul@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> "john" <deanwork2003@> wrote:
> >
> > ...
> > I have switched over the Canson paper for many of my surfaces ... and in all their high-end matte papers are not dye obas but pigments, so it is said.
> 
> 
> Do they state that on their web page or elsewhere?  I've never seen that claim.  It could be very interesting if true (as opposed to what some salesman says at a booth).
> 
> >... It seems like Mark was more concerned about them actually bleaching whiter than staining to yellow as most obas do.
> 
> I think the approach I'd like to see more of is balancing the paper bleaching with an OBA that fades at the same rate.  I called the ink version of this a "counter-fade" strategy when I incorporated  the concept in the original MIS FSN inkset.  HP may use it in their neutral inks -- at least it appears in their patent disclosures.  I think H Photo Rag gets its stability from such an approach also.
> 
> > 
> > ... so much for Wilhelm's ratings.
> 
> Like the Epson "Archival" 7500 inks -- just ignore the black end with its hybrid pigment-dye K and it looks a lot better.  Wilhelm has contributed a lot to the field, but to really know what is going on, we need the details.
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
>

How does one add an Epson RX620 to QTR in Mac OS 10.6?

2011-05-08 by Michael Vendrell

This worked just fine on a Windows XP machine but I cannot figure out how to add the QTR printer and profiles on the New Mac OS 10.6.  BTW the RX620 is a psc very closely related to the R220 and R320 series printers from Epson.  Any help will be greatly appreciated.  Thx!

Michael Vendrell

  
  Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use




   

  
  
  



     




     

  .


   





 



  










[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: paper quandary

2011-05-09 by Paul

"tboleyyh" <tyler@...> wrote:
>
> ... the non-brightened Alise ...would have been the go to version for some inksets that benifit from a colder coating reaction.

It was not very impressive with the dilute Eboni inksets.

> Oddly, the brightened version Epson hot and cold press seem to be doing pretty well in terms of brightener burn off.

Yes, because they are, in effect, using a counter-shift strategy.  Look at how much the natural version bleaches.  A Lab B move from 3.6 to 1.3 in 30 Mlux-Hrs.  Look at Ernst's spectral response of that paper -- not  a normal natural paper response curve.  It almost looks like they've added some yellow dye.

At page 3 of http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/1100-Eb4.pdf I graphed the Lab B values for the Hot Press N and W, and included a version of the N that had  been in the sun for a while.  I think they'll all end up looking very much like Premier  Art smooth 325 -- a very fine paper  that is what I specified for the museum project I did.


>... these papers are not rebranded Alise ...


The graphs noted above make the Epson paper  look much like  the Premier Art 325.  I have no inside info as to actual source, however. 

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

Re: paper quandary

2011-05-09 by tboleyyh

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <roark.paul@...> wrote:
>
> "john" <deanwork2003@> wrote:
> >
> > ...
> > I have switched over the Canson paper for many of my surfaces ... and in all their high-end matte papers are not dye obas but pigments, so it is said.
> 
> 
> Do they state that on their web page or elsewhere?..

from SOP website, I didn't look any farther..

"Internally Buffered Acid Free Museum Grade Paper - NO OBA's"

"Whiteness Controlled with Natural White Pigments to ensure consistency of Shade for Generations"

Re: paper quandary

2011-05-10 by john

Probably some form of Titanium White as is used in oil paints and acrylics. 



--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "tboleyyh" <tyler@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <roark.paul@> wrote:
> >
> > "john" <deanwork2003@> wrote:
> > >
> > > ...
> > > I have switched over the Canson paper for many of my surfaces ... and in all their high-end matte papers are not dye obas but pigments, so it is said.
> > 
> > 
> > Do they state that on their web page or elsewhere?..
> 
> from SOP website, I didn't look any farther..
> 
> "Internally Buffered Acid Free Museum Grade Paper - NO OBA's"
> 
> "Whiteness Controlled with Natural White Pigments to ensure consistency of Shade for Generations"
>

Re: paper quandary

2011-05-11 by Paul

"john" <deanwork2003@...> wrote:
>
> Probably some form of Titanium White as is used in oil paints and acrylics. 


That would be my guess also.  I once tried spraying some matte paper with a suspension of titanium dioxide, but in my experiment it actually made the paper less white -- not sure why.  At any rate, it's very interesting that they've found a way to whiten with pigments. 

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "tboleyyh" <tyler@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <roark.paul@> wrote:
> > >
> > > "john" <deanwork2003@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > > I have switched over the Canson paper for many of my surfaces ... and in all their high-end matte papers are not dye obas but pigments, so it is said.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Do they state that on their web page or elsewhere?..
> > 
> > from SOP website, I didn't look any farther..
> > 
> > "Internally Buffered Acid Free Museum Grade Paper - NO OBA's"
> > 
> > "Whiteness Controlled with Natural White Pigments to ensure consistency of Shade for Generations"
> >
>

Re: paper quandary

2011-05-11 by Paul

"Paul" <paulmwhiting@...> wrote:
>
> For several years I've been using PremierArt Smooth Fine Art 205 with good success but today when I went to Atlex to re-order I was told it was discontinued. ...


I'm told 205 is back at Premier and will hopefully be back in the pipeline soon.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

Re: paper quandary

2011-05-11 by Paul

That's great news, Paul, thanks. I just checked Atlex, the description says "discontinued" but as you say, it's "in the pipeline".

I've been studying all the posts since my initial one and although I'm very grateful for all the activity I must say I got a bit lost. As a relative newbie, I'm still not conversant in the various technical measurements.

After looking through lots of old threads here I was about to order a pack of Epson Hot Press Natural and the Alise Natural - not sure of exact names but I mean the ones without OBA's. Do you think either of those might be a decent replacement till the Premier Art 205 is on the shelves again?

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <roark.paul@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> I'm told 205 is back at Premier and will hopefully be back in the pipeline soon.
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
>

Re: paper quandary

2011-05-11 by Paul

"Paul" <paulmwhiting@...> wrote:
> ...
> After looking through lots of old threads here I was about to order a pack of Epson Hot Press Natural and the Alise Natural - not sure of exact names but I mean the ones without OBA's. Do you think either of those might be a decent replacement till the Premier Art 205 is on the shelves again?


It depends what you want and need.  I use more of the Premier Art 325 as what I consider an improvement on the 205 visually.  However, me tests indicate prints on the 325 are not quite as lightfast as those on the 205.  So, for example, if the ultimate in longevity for a museum or conservation project is needed, there is no substitute for the Epson Scrapbook/Premier 205 that I know of (that is, based on my tests and what I've been able to glean from other sources).

I do like the Epson Hot Press series.  I see it as Premier 325 with slightly better dmax, whiter when there are OBAs, and warmer when there are none.  The Epson Hot Press Natural bleaches more than most.  I have no information on how it might compare to Premier Art 325 in terms of image permanence.  My suspicion is that if you spray an image made with 100% carbon, all of these papers will deliver more than enough permanence for any purpose.  I suspect the coatings will crack and other physical damage will far outweigh any risk to the images from carbon fading.   

I was never very impressed with Alise -- great dmax, but not much else going for it.  I have not studied the Aardenburg tests to see how it is doing in terms of image permanence.

Bottom line -- Premier Art Smooth Hot Press 325 is what I considered for my museum project to be the best combination of longevity and visual quality with the Eboni-6 I used for that project.  We used 205 and 325 for all of the printing, using the 205 mainly where thickness of the 325 was a problem and where the purpose was archival storage of the images (not display).

Hope this helps.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <roark.paul@> wrote:
> 
> > I'm told 205 is back at Premier and will hopefully be back in the pipeline soon.
> > 
> > Paul
> > www.PaulRoark.com
> >
>

Re: paper quandary

2011-05-11 by Paul

Paul,

That was very helpful, thank you.

Now, in the Good News Dept.:

I called PremierImaging directly and I was told that indeed it is still manufactured. There'd been some hitch in their system, I didn't quite understand what. But I was told you had talked with them, and the guy I talked with is aware of this thread. So in about a week it should be back "in the pipeline".

He also said to try this place in the meantime, that they still stock Premier papers:

http://www.ultrafineonline.com/fiartinkjetp.html

So, things are looking up.

Paul

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <roark.paul@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> "Paul" <paulmwhiting@> wrote:
> > ...
> > After looking through lots of old threads here I was about to order a pack of Epson Hot Press Natural and the Alise Natural - not sure of exact names but I mean the ones without OBA's. Do you think either of those might be a decent replacement till the Premier Art 205 is on the shelves again?
> 
> 
> It depends what you want and need.  I use more of the Premier Art 325 as what I consider an improvement on the 205 visually.  However, me tests indicate prints on the 325 are not quite as lightfast as those on the 205.  So, for example, if the ultimate in longevity for a museum or conservation project is needed, there is no substitute for the Epson Scrapbook/Premier 205 that I know of (that is, based on my tests and what I've been able to glean from other sources).
> 
> I do like the Epson Hot Press series.  I see it as Premier 325 with slightly better dmax, whiter when there are OBAs, and warmer when there are none.  The Epson Hot Press Natural bleaches more than most.  I have no information on how it might compare to Premier Art 325 in terms of image permanence.  My suspicion is that if you spray an image made with 100% carbon, all of these papers will deliver more than enough permanence for any purpose.  I suspect the coatings will crack and other physical damage will far outweigh any risk to the images from carbon fading.   
> 
> I was never very impressed with Alise -- great dmax, but not much else going for it.  I have not studied the Aardenburg tests to see how it is doing in terms of image permanence.
> 
> Bottom line -- Premier Art Smooth Hot Press 325 is what I considered for my museum project to be the best combination of longevity and visual quality with the Eboni-6 I used for that project.  We used 205 and 325 for all of the printing, using the 205 mainly where thickness of the 325 was a problem and where the purpose was archival storage of the images (not display).
> 
> Hope this helps.
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <roark.paul@> wrote:
> > 
> > > I'm told 205 is back at Premier and will hopefully be back in the pipeline soon.
> > > 
> > > Paul
> > > www.PaulRoark.com
> > >
> >
>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.