I go with Martin's advice on the printer and driver. You may want to
wait on the CIS system (for the 1280 which has a chip on the carts,
you definitely want the nomorecarts flavor available from the sources
he lists plus InkJetArt.com) so you can try both the piezo driver
with FS ink or switch out to MIS VM ink with Paul's curves.
To me the difference is that the piezo is much more cookie
cutter...it has all the profiles for papers and pretty basic settings
that always produce something I like. With Paul's curves, you have a
lot more control...even though it isn't as easy to be totally
consistent, you can really make EXACTLY the print you want.
The other feature that endears me to the piezo driver is that it uses
the photoshop export module which prints 2x to 3x faster than the
Epson driver.
The chipped cart on the 1280 does allow you to switch carts, but you
probably want to stay with extremely compatible inks (FS and VM would
fit this definition). You really don't want to switch back and forth
more than you have to, though, because you introduce more possible
glitches like air bubbles etc. Once you have the CIS installed,
changing inks is a significantly bigger job.
Try some carts and then settle on one setup as a commitment of the
printer would be my advice.
Tom O'Connell
TomOC@...
www.thomasoconnell.com
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "dilcher" <dilcher@y...>
wrote:
> I am thinking of jumping into inkjet printing, and am having
trouble
> deciding between Piezo and MIS methods. I understand that
> Piezography is supposed to have a driver which makes a substantial
> difference in printing. Is this so? I saw this link:
> http://www.piezography.com/piezographyBW-comp-mis.html
> but, don't know if it is a fair comparison.
>
> Can anyone give me advice? I have set aside about $1400 for an
> inkjet printing system, and want to make sure I get the most bang
for
> my buck!