Barry-
I have a few items for you to consider. The imports are not a good
idea for the camera, but not bad for the lens. If it is not a Nikon
USA item, not only do you have no US warranty, but Nikon will not
even repair it for a fee. You can use third party repair shops and
such, but I would say that for something a complicated as the camera
body, it's not worth the risk.
The lenses are another kettle of fish. I've never had a problem with
a lens...especially a "vanilla" lens like, say a 105mm macro lens, so
why not save 25% and take a little risk...after you buy 4 lenses this
way, you can throw on away and be even <g>...they are exactly the
same product in almost every case.
You might want to read Moose Peterson's review on the D100 before you
make up your mind. Whether that is a good buy or a refurbed D1 is
better will be based on what you use the camera for. Moose likes the
refurbed D1 idea better...pixel count is only a small part of the
puzzle <g>.
I have a D1 and a D1x and love and use them both. Moose likes the D1h
better for the speed etc. I have a couple of friends who have bought
D100s and like them, but they are not what I would call "heavy users"
and the lighter body, etc is not a problem for them.
Both the Nikon and Canon high end cameras are fantastic...sort of a
jump ball...if you have any lenses for one or the other, then, that
is the way to go.
Cheers,
Tom O'Connell
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "bggilliand2001"
<bgilliand@m...> wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm getting a new camera, and I'm leaning toward the Nikon D100. I
> noticed that several dealers offer US and non-US cameras. The non
US
> are much less money. What are the "cons" of getting one of the non-
US
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Nikons? Any other advise (especially lenses) for multi-purpose work
> is much appreciated.
>
> Barry Gilliand