Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Piezotone SE vs. MIS FS: See Posted Images

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Piezotone SE vs. MIS FS: See Posted Images

2002-09-11 by Martin Wesley

----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "Mitch Alland" <malland@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 2:41 AM
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Piezotone SE vs. MIS FS: See Posted Images


> To: "Martin Wesley" <mwesley250@...>
>
> > I have run several test prints and wedges with the
> >MIS-FSN black replacing the PT black and this makes a nice ink
> >set.
>
> I thought that the MIS-FSN inks could be a straight replacement for the
original Piezo inks, while the latter were "incompatible" with the new
Piezotones. I, therefore, thought that the MIS-FSN inks would be
incompatible with the Piezotones as well.
>
> Having seen the Piezotone Selenium ink, I love the tones and would like to
start using it but am concerned about the fast fading of the blacks. Are you
sure that the MIS-FSN black is indeed compatible with the Piezotones? Have
you discussed this with the InkJetMall people?

Mitch,

The FS inks were designed as a clone of the original Piezo inks but clog and
fade less. I mixed some FS and PT ink together about a week ago to see if
there were any odd reactions. So far so good. The FS has the smell of a
heavy molecular weight alchol or perhaps a glycol while the PT smell more
like a lighter weight alcohol. In anycase I have not found anything to
suggest they are incompatible. I don't know that I would want to mix them
for use but by using the FS-K in place of the PT-K you only have to worry
about possible cross contamination on the parking pad. No I didn't discuss
it with the InkJetMall people since I have no reason to believe that they
would know for sure one way or the other. I would have tried it in anyway.
>
>
> >As of today I would still recommend the PiezoTone inks
> >if you replace the black with MIS-FSN black or Gen 4 black, if you want
to
> >get better Dmax and accept a shorter life.
>
> Huh? I thought that replacing the Piezotone black with MIS-FSN black would
give longer life.

FS black longest life and lowest Dmax, Gen 4 black shorter life than FS
black but longer than PT black with a strong Dmax, it has a 100+ year
Wilhelm rating if that is worth anything, PT black very short life it seems
but a good Dmax. The Gen 4 might be a compromise if you really want the
deeper black and are willing to sacrifice some fade resistance. Jerry says
he has been using them for quite awhile without a problem.

Martin.

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Piezotone SE vs. MIS FS: See Posted Images

2002-09-11 by Jerry Olson

To everybody -

How long a time would be acceptable to you for your prints to last? 35
years? 100?

The generations black and MIS VM inks seem be good for 35 years (black)
and 100+ years (MIS VM) in the Kodak RIT tests.  I've never seen fading
or color change in several years with this combination under low room
lighting conditions. And it can go 3 months in a sunny window without
change. I think this is about as good as you can get at this stage of
the game.

What paper and inks do all of you currently use for your best prints,
that you intend to sell, or for exhibition? It would be nice if everyone
could just post that information at the end of your next post, and we
could all see what the majority is using for their best works.

I sincerely hope that Brightcube doesn't go out of business. I don't
think there is a substitute for the Eclipse Satine paper that I've
settled on. What other paper is
Pure white? 100 percent rag, and acid free? thick and luxurious?
Textured on one side, smooth on the other, and printable on both sides?
Reasonably Priced?  

None!  Anyone have a candidate that is even close to this paper?

Jerry

[Digital BW] Re: Piezotone SE vs. MIS FS: See Posted Images

2002-09-11 by Albert Wang

> What paper and inks do all of you currently use for your best 
prints,
> that you intend to sell, or for exhibition? 

I presently use Epson inks in a C80 (til next year's upgrade). My 
papers include: EAM and Hahnemule Photo Rag 188 and 308 at the 
moment. Photo Rag 188 for prints, PR 308 for exhibition prints, and 
EAM for all test proofs.

Alfie

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.