Re: [Digital BW] Re: Paper?
2002-09-20 by Ernst Dinkla
----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "Antonis Ricos" <antonisphoto@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 7:39 AM Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Paper? > James, > > beware of non-Lyson papers, especially the ones that look and feel like Lyson > papers. They are made by Hahnemuhle, but have a coating specifically > formulated to work with Lyson dyes which are acidic. > > > Antonis Has anyone seen a firm scientific report or just a DIY attempt that there are differences between the Hahnemuhle paper coating and the special Lyson coated version of Hahnemuhle paper ? This tale is going on since the fade disaster of the Wilhelm Fotonic test. After that Lyson promised a better coating for their papers. At the Drupa now more than 2 years ago Hahnemuhle officials denied any difference between the coatings and they would certainly not deliver uncoated paper to third parties for coating. The last I can believe as their paper production wasn't able to keep up with their own sales for months. There's friction in the relation between Hahnemuhle and Lyson. Hahnemuhle had a deal with Lyson for the distribution of their papers on the Iris market. When the Epson piezo revolution occured the market shifted and Hahnemuhle sold their paper to everyone. The Epson variety of Lyson inks and especially the Fotonic LC and LM inks behaved very different on the papers than the Iris variety did, resulting in the bad Wilhelm tests. At that time this tale about a new coating was born and the misleading fade properties page at Lyson's site appeared. Ernst