Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

CFS for Epson 2100/2200?

CFS for Epson 2100/2200?

2002-11-14 by Digital Lucida

Forgive my ignorance on this topic but I'm having trouble concentrating long
enough to figure it out...

Does anyone know if a CFS, from MIS or anyone else, is being developed for
the 2100/2200?
Would using a mixture of the existing MIS inks work or would new ones be
needed?



-- 

Glenn

Re: CFS for Epson 2100/2200?

2002-11-14 by thronxx

MediaStreet had one they were working on I believe at the NYC Javitz 
Expo.

Jeffrey

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Digital Lucida 
<lucida@b...> wrote:
> Forgive my ignorance on this topic but I'm having trouble 
concentrating long
> enough to figure it out...
> 
> Does anyone know if a CFS, from MIS or anyone else, is being 
developed for
> the 2100/2200?
> Would using a mixture of the existing MIS inks work or would new 
ones be
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> needed?
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Glenn

Re: CFS for Epson 2100/2200?

2002-11-15 by hjswim2@aol.com

Glenn: < ...Does anyone know if a CFS, from MIS or anyone else, is being  
developed for the 2100/2200?...>

See my report on the PhotoPlus Expo show:
http://www.dpandi.com/newsreviews/reports/tradeshows/photoplus02/photoplus02.h

tml

I talk there about MediaStreet being the first third-party company to crack 
the 2200 chip and bring a 2200 CFS/CIS to market. Others are also working on 
the same thing. I've also got a photo of Norm Levy holding the new T007 
Universal Chip Resetter in his hand. 

Harald Johnson
author, "Mastering Digital Printing"
DP&I.com ( http://www.dpandi.com )

Re: [Digital BW] Re: CFS for Epson 2100/2200?

2002-11-15 by aitor Peña Inclán

El 15/11/02 16:36, "hjswim2@..." <hjswim2@...> escribió:

> Glenn: < ...Does anyone know if a CFS, from MIS or anyone else, is being
> developed for the 2100/2200?...>
> 
> See my report on the PhotoPlus Expo show:
> http://www.dpandi.com/newsreviews/reports/tradeshows/photoplus02/photoplus02.h
> 

This link doesn't work
aitor

Re: [Digital BW] Re: CFS for Epson 2100/2200?

2002-11-16 by Glenn

Thanks Harald.

MIS have also just released their refill procedure for the 2100/2200.
They look like they should have their CFS ready in the next 6 weeks or so.


on 16/11/02 2:36 AM, hjswim2@... put these thoughts into an email:

> Glenn: < ...Does anyone know if a CFS, from MIS or anyone else, is being
> developed for the 2100/2200?...>
> 
> See my report on the PhotoPlus Expo show:
> http://www.dpandi.com/newsreviews/reports/tradeshows/photoplus02/photoplus02.h
> 
> tml
> 
> I talk there about MediaStreet being the first third-party company to crack
> the 2200 chip and bring a 2200 CFS/CIS to market. Others are also working on
> the same thing. I've also got a photo of Norm Levy holding the new T007
> Universal Chip Resetter in his hand.
> 
> Harald Johnson
> author, "Mastering Digital Printing"
> DP&I.com ( http://www.dpandi.com )


-- 

Glenn

Re: CFS for Epson 2100/2200?

2002-11-16 by hjswim2@aol.com

aitor: > See my report on the PhotoPlus Expo show:

> 
http://www.dpandi.com/newsreviews/reports/tradeshows/photoplus02/photoplus02.h

> 

<This link doesn't work>

Try: http://www.dpandi.com

Navigate to the report via "Event Reports."

Harald

[Digital BW] Re: CFS for Epson 2100/2200?

2002-11-16 by Tom O'Connell

Just complete the ".html" extension and you have the correct URL.

Tom O'Connell

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., aitor Peña Inclán 
<aitorpinclan@t...> wrote:
> El 15/11/02 16:36, "hjswim2@a..." <hjswim2@a...> escribió:
> 
> > Glenn: < ...Does anyone know if a CFS, from MIS or anyone else, 
is being
> > developed for the 2100/2200?...>
> > 
> > See my report on the PhotoPlus Expo show:
> > 
http://www.dpandi.com/newsreviews/reports/tradeshows/photoplus02/photo
plus02.h
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > 
> 
> This link doesn't work
> aitor

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.