Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

[Digital BW] VM quad or hex?

[Digital BW] VM quad or hex?

2002-12-03 by Paul Roark

K2 wrote:

>I have the quad set for the 1160.  I'm wondering if there is anything
>to be gained by going to a 6 colour printer.  Has anyone compared the
>output side by side?

Some can see the blue toner dots in the highlights of the cool and nc curve
prints.  I don't notice them in normal photo viewing, but can see them in
test strips under bright lights.  The hextone machines take care of this
"problem."

If you have never been bothered by these dots, then you won't see much
difference.

To be honest, when I wrote the curves for the 870 and 1290, I thought there
was also an improvement in some of the dark shadow smoothness.  The newest
hextones may have better black ink printing that also shows up in smoother
dark tones.

I would, however, avoid the 1280.  The 1280, at least with the PC, has a
driver glitch that puts an unavoidable bump in the warm curve ramp.  It is
the only printer that has done this.  To me the 1290 is the best, with the
1270 second best.

Of course, I've stuck with my 1160, even though I probably could have kept
the hextone printers MIS sent to me, and the 1160 cost me about $150 to fix
a bad head.  I think the advantages of ease of use, flexibility of drivers
for FS/Piezo inksets, and lack of chips make the 1160 a very good overall
printer.

Paul
http://www.PaulRoark.com

Re: [Digital BW] VM quad or hex?

2002-12-03 by K2 Chittin

Paul

Thanks for the detailed explanation.  It sounds like the 1160/VM 
combo has a lot of life in it.  

K2

Re: [Digital BW] VM quad or hex?

2002-12-03 by Jerry Olson

Quick answer, 1280 prints are smoother, 1160 are sharper. Just barely 
noticeable in both cases. 1160 can show dots,
the 1280 won't.

Jerry



K2 Chittin wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> I have the quad set for the 1160.  I'm wondering if there is anything 
> to be gained by going to a 6 colour printer.  Has anyone compared the 
> output side by side?
> 
> K2
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 
>

Epson 1280 (wasVM quad or hex?)

2002-12-04 by Peter A. Klein

I have a 1280, and I've seen this "bump."  Its a place between the 
dark tones and midtones where a small change of tonality on the 
screen causes an abrupt change in the print.  Usually you can get 
around it by a small change in the brightness curve.  It's a pain, 
however.  Per your advice, Paul, I'm using Tyler's curves.  Which 
curves did you say were the least problematical?

I'm wondering if we might be able to use the 1270 driver on the 
1280?  I've done this for years with HP laser printers--if theres a 
problem with the Laserjet n, use the driver for an earlier printer.  
If the 1280 is just the 1270 with some smaller-scale movements to do 
2880 dpi, then it might work.  Has anyone tried this? 

Also, has anyone used Piezography on the 1280, and does it have the 
tonal "bump" that the Epson driver has?

--Peter


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Paul Roark" 
<paul.roark@v...> wrote:
> I would, however, avoid the 1280.  The 1280, at least with the PC, 
has a
> driver glitch that puts an unavoidable bump in the warm curve 
ramp.  It is
> the only printer that has done this.  To me the 1290 is the best, 
with the
> 1270 second best.
> 
> Of course, I've stuck with my 1160, even though I probably could 
have kept
> the hextone printers MIS sent to me, and the 1160 cost me about 
$150 to fix
> a bad head.  I think the advantages of ease of use, flexibility of 
drivers
> for FS/Piezo inksets, and lack of chips make the 1160 a very good 
overall
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> printer.
> 
> Paul
> http://www.PaulRoark.com

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.