--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "pasajack
<pasajack@y...>" <pasajack@y...> wrote:
> if you can't understand what bob dylan is saying, you can never be a
> good photographer. And it is not just a matter of taste-it goes
> deeper...
> Pasajack
I can understand perfectly what he is saying. It's when he starts
singing I have a hard time....
C'mon now, is this trolling or what? I could just as easily say that
unless you've seen all Shakespeare's plays you don't understand human
nature, therefore can't be an artist. Or read Tolstey's "War and
Peace", or Dostoyevsky's "Brothers Karamazov" (sorry, I'm half
Russian<g>), James Joyce, or Kafka...or do you prefer to say there are
no writers before Ginsberg and Kesey? Actually, if you want scathing
social commentary the master was Jonathan Swift before Disney got
ahold of him. Still relevent today. Dylan once confessed that he was
not satisfied with a book of poetry he had published, and his talents
did not lie in that venue (that from memory, check me out on it).
I heard of a blind photographer. I guess he was famous, at least some
time back. He had a little vision in the center of his field, but it
was all blurry. He would just see a blur of light and take a picture
of it. I guess he had some help later in the darkroom screening them
out.
Someone else, (who is it now) took pictures with old discarded cheap
$5 cameras. Light leaks and flares would be a part of the final image.
Then there's St. Ansel lugging his ole f64 8 x 10 around mountains,
cooking up formulations in the darkroom, getting it all precise.
Jim H.