Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow

Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow

2002-12-07 by Phil Morse

Stan,

So you drag the rod, not turning it?  Hmmmmm.  Will have to try this,
thanks.

Phil

"Shire,Stanley" wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> Walking thru Lowe's this morning, I passed the screen door parts
> display. About halfway down the aisle I did a double-take (rarely seen
> in Lowe's). Geez, that looks like a Mayer Rod (Mayer Bar). On closer
> inspection, I was intrigued and, not yet having ordered a Mayer Rod, I
> bought the spring. (#4 D&G Spring, Zinc, about 15.25" in length) $2.42.
> I put a digital micrometer (hey, we're talkin' digital printing here so
> I just couldn't use an analog micrometer) on the spring wire..it
> measures about .0488. This is larger than Paul's #14 Mayer (I think
> .035) but I was already in for the $2.42. A 1/4" dowel fits nicely
> inside the spring once I cut the attachment loops off each end.
> Plate glass on my workbench (cabinetmaking bench..honest, it's dead
> flat), taped an Epson Smooth Fine Art print to the glass, dribbled some
> Minwax Polycrylic above the print (note how scientific this is) and
> lightly dragged the rod through the poly and down the print.
> Lovely coating, smooth, no bubbles. The print looks much richer with
> great blacks. Couldn't measure the blacks as I was not up to driving
> downtown to access the densitometer at the college. The coating is
> obviously thicker than Paul's (a Mayer Rod coating is 1/10 the wire
> diameter; so Paul's #14 is .0035 in thick and mine is .0048)
> Cleanup was easy. Pulled the dowel out, rinsed inside and outside with
> water.
> I will get a #14 rod for the thinner coating (unless I can find a
> smaller screen door spring (would that be a number 3 or a #5?)
> 
> Stan Shire
> Associate Professor/Department Chair
> Photographic Imaging
> Community College of Philadelphia
> Adobe Photoshop 6 A.C.E.
> Author: Hands On Photoshop 7: Tutorial Workshops

RE: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow

2002-12-07 by Shire,Stanley

The print is now totally dry. Still looks good. It has expanded in size
from 11" to 11 1/16" 
The surface with the Minwax Gloss Polycrylic is very, very slightly
glossier than air dried fiber base F surface paper. 
 
Stan Shire
Associate Professor/Department Chair
Photographic Imaging
Community College of Philadelphia
Adobe Photoshop 6 A.C.E.
Author: Hands On Photoshop 7: Tutorial Workshops

215 751-8320
sshire@...
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Morse [mailto:pmorse@...] 
Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 4:14 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow
 
Stan,

So you drag the rod, not turning it?  Hmmmmm.  Will have to try this,
thanks.

Phil

"Shire,Stanley" wrote:
> 
> Walking thru Lowe's this morning, I passed the screen door parts
> display. About halfway down the aisle I did a double-take (rarely seen
> in Lowe's). Geez, that looks like a Mayer Rod (Mayer Bar). On closer
> inspection, I was intrigued and, not yet having ordered a Mayer Rod, I
> bought the spring. (#4 D&G Spring, Zinc, about 15.25" in length)
$2.42.
> I put a digital micrometer (hey, we're talkin' digital printing here
so
> I just couldn't use an analog micrometer) on the spring wire..it
> measures about .0488. This is larger than Paul's #14 Mayer (I think
> .035) but I was already in for the $2.42. A 1/4" dowel fits nicely
> inside the spring once I cut the attachment loops off each end.
> Plate glass on my workbench (cabinetmaking bench..honest, it's dead
> flat), taped an Epson Smooth Fine Art print to the glass, dribbled
some
> Minwax Polycrylic above the print (note how scientific this is) and
> lightly dragged the rod through the poly and down the print.
> Lovely coating, smooth, no bubbles. The print looks much richer with
> great blacks. Couldn't measure the blacks as I was not up to driving
> downtown to access the densitometer at the college. The coating is
> obviously thicker than Paul's (a Mayer Rod coating is 1/10 the wire
> diameter; so Paul's #14 is .0035 in thick and mine is .0048)
> Cleanup was easy. Pulled the dowel out, rinsed inside and outside with
> water.
> I will get a #14 rod for the thinner coating (unless I can find a
> smaller screen door spring (would that be a number 3 or a #5?)
> 
> Stan Shire
> Associate Professor/Department Chair
> Photographic Imaging
> Community College of Philadelphia
> Adobe Photoshop 6 A.C.E.
> Author: Hands On Photoshop 7: Tutorial Workshops


Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this
same page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to
keep them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject
header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
"flames."
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage. 




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>  Terms of Service. 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow

2002-12-08 by Paul Roark

Stan,

You wrote:

>... screen door parts ... looks like a Mayer Rod ..
>the spring. (#4 D&G Spring, Zinc, about 15.25" in length) $2.42.

I like it.  Now we'll have to see if they have different sizes of springs.

> .0488. This is larger than Paul's #14 Mayer (I think
>.035)

I think the #15 that I started with has .015" wire on it.  I thought that is
where they got those numbers from.

I find myself using the #30 most now, and I think EAM absorbs so much it
could go to a #45 -- so we may be close here.

> A 1/4" dowel fits nicely inside the spring ...

Does it roll when you drag it across the surface?  I was told not to roll
the bar, but I'm not sure what effect that would have (aside from leaving a
lot more of the coating on the rod/spring.

Keep experimenting.

I think the toughest part may be scaling the process up to large prints.
I'm not getting the evenness I'd like to on my 16x20s, and Mark Tucker has
resorted to spraying for larger prints -- which is more work.

I'm not sure the hard glass surface is the best.  As the print and rod
length get larger, I think maintaining a precise flatness becomes much more
difficult.  I have found that a couple pieces of paper under an 8x10 helps.
I think more of a cushion under a larger print may be needed.  In the real
world use of these rods, a flexible web is dragged across the rod.  This is
flexible enough that the surface being coated conforms to the rod.  I notice
that Diversified Enterprises uses 1/2 inch glass on its platform, and they
have a cushion that is also used.

So, I think we may need to experiment with different surfaces.

For cleanup, I also think coated butcher paper makes a lot of sense.

So, my next experiments may include a piece of cloth taped to the glass,
then some butcher paper over that. I've tried some felt, and that was too
thick.  The resulting coating had lines in it.

So, just keep experimenting.  The results look good enough to warrant the
effort.

Paul
http://www.PaulRoark.com

Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow

2002-12-08 by Mark Tucker <mark@marktucker.com>

>--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul 
>Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote:
> I'm not getting the evenness I'd like to on my 16x20s, and Mark 
>Tucker has
> resorted to spraying for larger prints -- which is more work.
-------

Quite a bit more work. Although, due to the increased DMAX, it 
makes it all more than worthwhile. Here are two shots from my 
new Goober Spray Booth:

http://marktucker.com/epson/booth.jpg
http://marktucker.com/epson/booth2.jpg

I do not think there's any way to keep a large print flat enough to 
use that MayerBar on it. Unless maybe a vacuum table, but i'm 
not willing to go that far.

Ironically, I have switched papers to the Epson Velvet Somerset 
505gsm sheet weight in this 9600, and with the tweaked 
Atkinson profile for it, I am not even feeling the desire to coat 
them. Which is really a drag after spending all this money and 
time buying sprayers, etc. That 505 paper is just gorgeous.

We'll see what happens. I'm sure I'll change my mind tomorrow.

MT, http://www.marktucker.com/

Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow

2002-12-08 by Carl Schofield

I think most screen door springs are made of 16 gauge wire (0.05 inch 
diameter) which would equate to a #50 mayer rod.
http://www.gardco.com/rodschart.html
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Sunday, December 8, 2002, at 12:17  AM, Paul Roark wrote:

> Stan,
>
> You wrote:
>
>> ... screen door parts ... looks like a Mayer Rod ..
>> the spring. (#4 D&G Spring, Zinc, about 15.25" in length) $2.42.
>
> I like it.  Now we'll have to see if they have different sizes of 
> springs.
>
>> .0488. This is larger than Paul's #14 Mayer (I think
>> .035)
>
> I think the #15 that I started with has .015" wire on it.  I thought 
> that is
> where they got those numbers from.
>
> I find myself using the #30 most now, and I think EAM absorbs so much 
> it
> could go to a #45 -- so we may be close here.
>
>> A 1/4" dowel fits nicely inside the spring ...
>
> Does it roll when you drag it across the surface?  I was told not to 
> roll
> the bar, but I'm not sure what effect that would have (aside from 
> leaving a
> lot more of the coating on the rod/spring.
>
> Keep experimenting.
>
> I think the toughest part may be scaling the process up to large 
> prints.
> I'm not getting the evenness I'd like to on my 16x20s, and Mark Tucker 
> has
> resorted to spraying for larger prints -- which is more work.
>
> I'm not sure the hard glass surface is the best.  As the print and rod
> length get larger, I think maintaining a precise flatness becomes much 
> more
> difficult.  I have found that a couple pieces of paper under an 8x10 
> helps.
> I think more of a cushion under a larger print may be needed.  In the 
> real
> world use of these rods, a flexible web is dragged across the rod.  
> This is
> flexible enough that the surface being coated conforms to the rod.  I 
> notice
> that Diversified Enterprises uses 1/2 inch glass on its platform, and 
> they
> have a cushion that is also used.
>
> So, I think we may need to experiment with different surfaces.
>
> For cleanup, I also think coated butcher paper makes a lot of sense.
>
> So, my next experiments may include a piece of cloth taped to the 
> glass,
> then some butcher paper over that. I've tried some felt, and that was 
> too
> thick.  The resulting coating had lines in it.
>
> So, just keep experimenting.  The results look good enough to warrant 
> the
> effort.
>
> Paul
> http://www.PaulRoark.com
>
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls 
> and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish 
> to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting 
> this same page.
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to 
> keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject 
> header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
> &amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the 
> various resources on the homepage.
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

RE: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow

2002-12-08 by Shire,Stanley

Paul:
I did not roll the screen door spring/dowel combo, but rather dragged it
(letting its own weight be the major downward force). No rolling.
Thanks to Carl for his link to the wire size charts. Now we can really
talk knowledgeably about our wet film thicknesses.
 
The expansion in print size (1/16" over 11") after coating and drying
was interesting.
 
I will try the "padding" under the print. 
 
In an effort to minimize handling while wet, etc. I was considering a
layer of plastic wrap (wrapping the glass and "padding") under the
print. My thought is that I could leave the wet print taped in place,
minimize handling and still have easy cleanup. Does this seem
reasonable?
 
Let's hope that Epson does not get this information or screen door
springs will be given an Epson part number, cost 49.95 and be
unavailable due to a screen door strike.
S.
 
Stan Shire
Associate Professor/Department Chair
Photographic Imaging
Community College of Philadelphia
Adobe Photoshop 6 A.C.E.
Author: Hands On Photoshop 7: Tutorial Workshops

215 751-8320
sshire@...
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Roark [mailto:paul.roark@...] 
Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 12:18 AM
To: DigitalB&WPrint
Subject: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow
 
Stan,

You wrote:

>... screen door parts ... looks like a Mayer Rod ..
>the spring. (#4 D&G Spring, Zinc, about 15.25" in length) $2.42.

I like it.  Now we'll have to see if they have different sizes of
springs.

> .0488. This is larger than Paul's #14 Mayer (I think
>.035)

I think the #15 that I started with has .015" wire on it.  I thought
that is
where they got those numbers from.

I find myself using the #30 most now, and I think EAM absorbs so much it
could go to a #45 -- so we may be close here.

> A 1/4" dowel fits nicely inside the spring ...

Does it roll when you drag it across the surface?  I was told not to
roll
the bar, but I'm not sure what effect that would have (aside from
leaving a
lot more of the coating on the rod/spring.

Keep experimenting.

I think the toughest part may be scaling the process up to large prints.
I'm not getting the evenness I'd like to on my 16x20s, and Mark Tucker
has
resorted to spraying for larger prints -- which is more work.

I'm not sure the hard glass surface is the best.  As the print and rod
length get larger, I think maintaining a precise flatness becomes much
more
difficult.  I have found that a couple pieces of paper under an 8x10
helps.
I think more of a cushion under a larger print may be needed.  In the
real
world use of these rods, a flexible web is dragged across the rod.  This
is
flexible enough that the surface being coated conforms to the rod.  I
notice
that Diversified Enterprises uses 1/2 inch glass on its platform, and
they
have a cushion that is also used.

So, I think we may need to experiment with different surfaces.

For cleanup, I also think coated butcher paper makes a lot of sense.

So, my next experiments may include a piece of cloth taped to the glass,
then some butcher paper over that. I've tried some felt, and that was
too
thick.  The resulting coating had lines in it.

So, just keep experimenting.  The results look good enough to warrant
the
effort.

Paul
http://www.PaulRoark.com



Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this
same page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to
keep them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject
header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
&amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage. 




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>  Terms of Service. 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

RE: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow

2002-12-08 by Shire,Stanley

Carl:
Thanks for the chart. As soon as I locate a catalog for screen door
springs we can perhaps use it to get some equivalency chart between the
mayer rods and the springs.
 
Stan Shire
Associate Professor/Department Chair
Photographic Imaging
Community College of Philadelphia
Adobe Photoshop 6 A.C.E.
Author: Hands On Photoshop 7: Tutorial Workshops

215 751-8320
sshire@...
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: Carl Schofield [mailto:scho@...] 
Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 9:18 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow
 
I think most screen door springs are made of 16 gauge wire (0.05 inch 
diameter) which would equate to a #50 mayer rod.
http://www.gardco.com/rodschart.html

On Sunday, December 8, 2002, at 12:17  AM, Paul Roark wrote:

> Stan,
>
> You wrote:
>
>> ... screen door parts ... looks like a Mayer Rod ..
>> the spring. (#4 D&G Spring, Zinc, about 15.25" in length) $2.42.
>
> I like it.  Now we'll have to see if they have different sizes of 
> springs.
>
>> .0488. This is larger than Paul's #14 Mayer (I think
>> .035)
>
> I think the #15 that I started with has .015" wire on it.  I thought 
> that is
> where they got those numbers from.
>
> I find myself using the #30 most now, and I think EAM absorbs so much 
> it
> could go to a #45 -- so we may be close here.
>
>> A 1/4" dowel fits nicely inside the spring ...
>
> Does it roll when you drag it across the surface?  I was told not to 
> roll
> the bar, but I'm not sure what effect that would have (aside from 
> leaving a
> lot more of the coating on the rod/spring.
>
> Keep experimenting.
>
> I think the toughest part may be scaling the process up to large 
> prints.
> I'm not getting the evenness I'd like to on my 16x20s, and Mark Tucker

> has
> resorted to spraying for larger prints -- which is more work.
>
> I'm not sure the hard glass surface is the best.  As the print and rod
> length get larger, I think maintaining a precise flatness becomes much

> more
> difficult.  I have found that a couple pieces of paper under an 8x10 
> helps.
> I think more of a cushion under a larger print may be needed.  In the 
> real
> world use of these rods, a flexible web is dragged across the rod.  
> This is
> flexible enough that the surface being coated conforms to the rod.  I 
> notice
> that Diversified Enterprises uses 1/2 inch glass on its platform, and 
> they
> have a cushion that is also used.
>
> So, I think we may need to experiment with different surfaces.
>
> For cleanup, I also think coated butcher paper makes a lot of sense.
>
> So, my next experiments may include a piece of cloth taped to the 
> glass,
> then some butcher paper over that. I've tried some felt, and that was 
> too
> thick.  The resulting coating had lines in it.
>
> So, just keep experimenting.  The results look good enough to warrant 
> the
> effort.
>
> Paul
> http://www.PaulRoark.com
>
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls 
> and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish 
> to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting 
> this same page.
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to 
> keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject 
> header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
> &amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the 
> various resources on the homepage.
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>


Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this
same page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to
keep them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject
header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
&amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage. 




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>  Terms of Service. 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow

2002-12-08 by Phil Morse

Stan,

Go to http://www.pbase.com/image/8549120 for a lead on the springs. 
These are from a very old McMasters but will probably be the OK.

Phil Morse

"Shire,Stanley" wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> Carl:
> Thanks for the chart. As soon as I locate a catalog for screen door
> springs we can perhaps use it to get some equivalency chart between the
> mayer rods and the springs.
> 
> Stan Shire
> Associate Professor/Department Chair
> Photographic Imaging
> Community College of Philadelphia
> Adobe Photoshop 6 A.C.E.
> Author: Hands On Photoshop 7: Tutorial Workshops
>

RE: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow

2002-12-08 by Shire,Stanley

Phil:
Thanks for the spring ref. Looks like the stainless steel would be the
answer. I'm on it. More tests with various wire diameters to come.
 
Stan Shire
Associate Professor/Department Chair
Photographic Imaging
Community College of Philadelphia
Adobe Photoshop 6 A.C.E.
Author: Hands On Photoshop 7: Tutorial Workshops

215 751-8320
sshire@...
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Morse [mailto:pmorse@...] 
Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 11:53 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow
 
Stan,

Go to http://www.pbase.com/image/8549120 for a lead on the springs. 
These are from a very old McMasters but will probably be the OK.

Phil Morse

"Shire,Stanley" wrote:
> 
> Carl:
> Thanks for the chart. As soon as I locate a catalog for screen door
> springs we can perhaps use it to get some equivalency chart between
the
> mayer rods and the springs.
> 
> Stan Shire
> Associate Professor/Department Chair
> Photographic Imaging
> Community College of Philadelphia
> Adobe Photoshop 6 A.C.E.
> Author: Hands On Photoshop 7: Tutorial Workshops
>


Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this
same page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to
keep them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject
header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
&amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage. 




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>  Terms of Service. 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow

2002-12-08 by Carl Schofield

Many thanks to Stanley, Paul, and Phil for all of the leads and info on 
this coating process.  I just tried the "faux meyer rod" technique with 
a Stanley screen door spring (1/2" OD, about 12" long,zinc coated) and 
some Zar water based poly (not up to specs, but all I could find at the 
local hardware store).  I didn't use a dowel because the spring is 
quite stiff and didn't flex at all when pulling the poly over the 
print.  For the trials I used small UC matte black prints on 8.5x11 
inch 190gsm Eclipse Satine BW, taped to a sheet of glass, with copy 
paper backing as recommended by Paul.  First trial I didn't apply 
enough poly (used about 8cc) and the bead (puddle) was a little skimpy 
at the ends so by the time I reached the bottom of the print I ran out 
of poly and the bottom corners didn't get coated.  Second trial I used 
about 12cc of poly and was more careful laying out the bead across the 
top of the print and got a perfect coat.  I was absolutely stunned by 
the beauty of the surface and depth of the blacks - looks exactly like 
some of my old air dried silver prints on Oriental Seagull.

If you haven't already found it, the McMaster-Carr catalog is online, 
including all of the springs that Phil showed from his catalog:
http://www.mcmaster.com/

Carl
Show quoted textHide quoted text
  On Sunday, December 8, 2002, at 12:15  PM, Shire,Stanley wrote:

> Phil:
> Thanks for the spring ref. Looks like the stainless steel would be the
> answer. I'm on it. More tests with various wire diameters to come.
>
> Stan Shire
> Associate Professor/Department Chair
> Photographic Imaging
> Community College of Philadelphia
> Adobe Photoshop 6 A.C.E.
> Author: Hands On Photoshop 7: Tutorial Workshops
>
> 215 751-8320
> sshire@...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Morse [mailto:pmorse@...]
> Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 11:53 AM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow
>
> Stan,
>
> Go to http://www.pbase.com/image/8549120 for a lead on the springs.
> These are from a very old McMasters but will probably be the OK.
>
> Phil Morse
>
> "Shire,Stanley" wrote:
>>
>> Carl:
>> Thanks for the chart. As soon as I locate a catalog for screen door
>> springs we can perhaps use it to get some equivalency chart between
> the
>> mayer rods and the springs.
>>
>> Stan Shire
>> Associate Professor/Department Chair
>> Photographic Imaging
>> Community College of Philadelphia
>> Adobe Photoshop 6 A.C.E.
>> Author: Hands On Photoshop 7: Tutorial Workshops
>>
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls 
> and
> other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this
> same page.
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to
> keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject
> header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
> &amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the 
> various
> resources on the homepage.
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>  Terms of Service.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls 
> and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish 
> to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting 
> this same page.
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to 
> keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject 
> header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
> &amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the 
> various resources on the homepage.
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

RE: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow

2002-12-08 by Shire,Stanley

More test results. At Paul's suggestion I laid a few sheets of copy
paper under the print. Better. Recommended.
I also tried covering the copy paper and glass with Saran Wrap. My
thought was to leave the print undisturbed until dry.
Bad idea. The poly did not dry on the bottom. I removed it and dried it
on a junk matboard. 
All was well. Print looks great. Printed a second copy, uncoated for
densitometer measurements tomorrow.
Next try will be to dry the print on a fiberglass screen (I knew there
was a reason not to toss those silver print drying screens.)
 
Stan Shire
Associate Professor/Department Chair
Photographic Imaging
Community College of Philadelphia
Adobe Photoshop 6 A.C.E.
Author: Hands On Photoshop 7: Tutorial Workshops

215 751-8320
sshire@...
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: Carl Schofield [mailto:scho@...] 
Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 1:23 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow
 
Many thanks to Stanley, Paul, and Phil for all of the leads and info on 
this coating process.  I just tried the "faux meyer rod" technique with 
a Stanley screen door spring (1/2" OD, about 12" long,zinc coated) and 
some Zar water based poly (not up to specs, but all I could find at the 
local hardware store).  I didn't use a dowel because the spring is 
quite stiff and didn't flex at all when pulling the poly over the 
print.  For the trials I used small UC matte black prints on 8.5x11 
inch 190gsm Eclipse Satine BW, taped to a sheet of glass, with copy 
paper backing as recommended by Paul.  First trial I didn't apply 
enough poly (used about 8cc) and the bead (puddle) was a little skimpy 
at the ends so by the time I reached the bottom of the print I ran out 
of poly and the bottom corners didn't get coated.  Second trial I used 
about 12cc of poly and was more careful laying out the bead across the 
top of the print and got a perfect coat.  I was absolutely stunned by 
the beauty of the surface and depth of the blacks - looks exactly like 
some of my old air dried silver prints on Oriental Seagull.

If you haven't already found it, the McMaster-Carr catalog is online, 
including all of the springs that Phil showed from his catalog:
http://www.mcmaster.com/

Carl
  On Sunday, December 8, 2002, at 12:15  PM, Shire,Stanley wrote:

> Phil:
> Thanks for the spring ref. Looks like the stainless steel would be the
> answer. I'm on it. More tests with various wire diameters to come.
>
> Stan Shire
> Associate Professor/Department Chair
> Photographic Imaging
> Community College of Philadelphia
> Adobe Photoshop 6 A.C.E.
> Author: Hands On Photoshop 7: Tutorial Workshops
>
> 215 751-8320
> sshire@...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Morse [mailto:pmorse@...]
> Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 11:53 AM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow
>
> Stan,
>
> Go to http://www.pbase.com/image/8549120 for a lead on the springs.
> These are from a very old McMasters but will probably be the OK.
>
> Phil Morse
>
> "Shire,Stanley" wrote:
>>
>> Carl:
>> Thanks for the chart. As soon as I locate a catalog for screen door
>> springs we can perhaps use it to get some equivalency chart between
> the
>> mayer rods and the springs.
>>
>> Stan Shire
>> Associate Professor/Department Chair
>> Photographic Imaging
>> Community College of Philadelphia
>> Adobe Photoshop 6 A.C.E.
>> Author: Hands On Photoshop 7: Tutorial Workshops
>>
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls 
> and
> other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish
to
> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this
> same page.
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to
> keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject
> header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
> &amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the 
> various
> resources on the homepage.
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>  Terms of Service.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls 
> and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish 
> to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting 
> this same page.
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to 
> keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject 
> header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
> &amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the 
> various resources on the homepage.
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>


Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this
same page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to
keep them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject
header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
&amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage. 




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>  Terms of Service. 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow

2002-12-08 by Mark Tucker <mark@marktucker.com>

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, 
"Shire,Stanley" <sshire@c...> wrote:
Next try will be to dry the print on a fiberglass screen (I knew 
there
> was a reason not to toss those silver print drying screens.)


Stan,

They Hydrocote that I'm using (and Paul) is nasty stuff when it 
comes to drying. It dries very fast, and it will stick to almost 
anything. I've lost several test prints, due to leaving them alone, 
lying flat on wood, or something else. I come back ten minutes 
later, and they are STUCK solid to whatever they were lying on. 

I would suggest maybe a quart can of paint, and then lay the print 
on its back, with the quart of paint dead center of the Letter size 
print. Just so that no coating is touching any part of what its 
resting on.

The coating process is most definitely a double edged sword.

RE: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow

2002-12-08 by Shire,Stanley

Thanks for the warning. I'm expecting my Hydrocote shipment tomorrow.
 
 
Stan Shire
Associate Professor/Department Chair
Photographic Imaging
Community College of Philadelphia
Adobe Photoshop 6 A.C.E.
Author: Hands On Photoshop 7: Tutorial Workshops

215 751-8320
sshire@...
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Tucker <mark@...> [mailto:mark@...] 
Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 4:03 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow
 
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, 
"Shire,Stanley" <sshire@c...> wrote:
Next try will be to dry the print on a fiberglass screen (I knew 
there
> was a reason not to toss those silver print drying screens.)


Stan,

They Hydrocote that I'm using (and Paul) is nasty stuff when it 
comes to drying. It dries very fast, and it will stick to almost 
anything. I've lost several test prints, due to leaving them alone, 
lying flat on wood, or something else. I come back ten minutes 
later, and they are STUCK solid to whatever they were lying on. 

I would suggest maybe a quart can of paint, and then lay the print 
on its back, with the quart of paint dead center of the Letter size 
print. Just so that no coating is touching any part of what its 
resting on.

The coating process is most definitely a double edged sword.





Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


ADVERTISEMENT
 
<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=234081.2711418.4084139.1925585/D=egroupweb/S=1705
019182:HM/A=1327986/R=0/*http:/ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4870027;7586687;a?
http://www.ameriquestmortgage.com/welcome.html?ad=Yahoo01> 

 
<http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=234081.2711418.4084139.1925585/D=egrou
pmail/S=:HM/A=1327986/rand=777317278> 

Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this
same page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to
keep them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject
header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
&amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage. 




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>  Terms of Service. 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow

2002-12-08 by Tom Andrews <tandrews@boulder.net>

Hi Mark,

How would you compare your E Velvet Somerset prints without coating with 
the coated ESFA prints you have been experimenting with?  Have you 
compared the same image printed both ways?  This coating business for large 
prints sounds like a huge pain in the ass.   Some time ago you were printing 
on Brightcube Eclipse Satine BrightWhite (print exchange-really nice!).  How 
do you compare this with the E Velvet Somerset?  And have you tried the 
Hahnemuhle PhotoRag for comparison?  I know you are looking for a really 
substantial hands on feel for your paper, but I am trying to get an idea of the 
print appearance without concern for paper weight.  Many thanks!!

Tom Andrews
http://www.wildlandart.com
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> Ironically, I have switched papers to the Epson Velvet Somerset 
> 505gsm sheet weight in this 9600, and with the tweaked 
> Atkinson profile for it, I am not even feeling the desire to coat 
> them. Which is really a drag after spending all this money and 
> time buying sprayers, etc. That 505 paper is just gorgeous.
> 
> We'll see what happens. I'm sure I'll change my mind tomorrow.
> 
> MT, http://www.marktucker.com/

Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow

2002-12-09 by Steven Karafyllakis <stevek@evcom.net>

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Shire,Stanley" 
<sshire@c...> wrote:
> More test results. At Paul's suggestion I laid a few sheets of copy
> paper under the print. Better. Recommended.
> I also tried covering the copy paper and glass with Saran Wrap. My
> thought was to leave the print undisturbed until dry.
> Bad idea. The poly did not dry on the bottom. I removed it and 
dried it
> on a junk matboard. 
> All was well. Print looks great. Printed a second copy, uncoated 
for
> densitometer measurements tomorrow.
> Next try will be to dry the print on a fiberglass screen (I knew 
there
> was a reason not to toss those silver print drying screens.)
>  
> Stan Shire
> Associate Professor/Department Chair
> Photographic Imaging
> Community College of Philadelphia

Hi Stanley;

Not to throw you off on a tangent, but have any of you guys done any 
silk-screening? I mean the manual fine-art type of course. I think 
it may be useable as a way to coat large prints. If  not, let me 
describe the equipment, and why I think it would work.
 A screen-printing frame is a 2"x2" wood frame of whatever size with 
very fine polyester mesh stretched across it (I’m not asking you to 
wear it now!) and a 2inch or so border of wide paper tape around the 
inside perimeter of the mesh, also covering the sides of the frame 
itself.  When you print, the frame is hinged at one end, and 1/8 
inch high small cardboard slivers at each corner keep it of the 
paper until you’re ready to print. When you’re ready to ‘pull a 
print’ you pour a thick bead of ink onto the protective tape border, 
put a flat heavy rubber squeegee behind the ink, press down and pull 
simultaneously all the way down the length of the print until the 
pool of excess ink is all back on the tape border again. As you pass 
down, the screen behind you lifts up off the paper, having deposited 
a smooth layer of ink on your paper, and then pops of completely 
when you release pressure. A second pas in the other direction fills 
in any gaps and returns the excess to the top, ready for another 
pass. Wether or not there is a screen texture in the image depends 
on the viscosity of the ink and the coarseness of the screen, but I 
think that coating materials are all much thinner than ink and would 
lay down flat immediately. I’m quite sure that if it does work, (and 
I think it will) it will work as well for large prints as it does 
for small ones, and the setup costs are way less than airbrush 
spraying equipment,  and of course not spraying it is way less 
dangerous to your health.
 So. My question to you Stan is this: does your College have a 
screen-printing studio? If it does, perhaps you could go by and 
watch someone pull a few prints and evaluate the idea? If not, I 
will eventually try it myself, (I have an old screen around 
somewhere) but it may be a few weeks before I have the time what 
with Christmas and other projects in process.

I look forward to hearing from you

Steve K

http://www.stevekphoto.com
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Adobe Photoshop 6 A.C.E.
> Author: Hands On Photoshop 7: Tutorial Workshops
> 
>

Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow

2002-12-09 by Peter Marquis-Kyle

Steve K wrote suggesting silk screen printing for coating inkjet
prints.

I have never coated a print with a squeegee or a mayer rod, but it
seems to me that screen printing would allow you to put down a
precisely defined area of coating -- perhaps just larger than the
printed image -- rather than a messy edge that threatens to glue the
print to the workbench.

Deeply obsessive people might like to see an expanse of uncoated paper
outside the coated inkjet image, but inside the window mat.

When I saw Mark Tucker's pictures of his spray booth, I thought of
masking tape for the same purpose.

(Didn't Ernst Dinkla mention screen printed coatings here a long time
ago, or was that on some other list...)

Peter Marquis-Kyle

Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow

2002-12-09 by Ernst Dinkla

Peter, you wrote:

> (Didn't Ernst Dinkla mention screen printed coatings here a long time
> ago, or was that on some other list...)


Yes, I did.

My Thieme 3/4 automat 4.5 x 3.5 feet with a 23 feet drying section + UV
curing unit has been used the last weeks to print 29 short runs for 8
serigraphs. This week is more prosaic: signs in 6 colours.

Printing UV curable varnishes (acryl based) on offset printed material is
done very often here. That can't be used on matt inkjet paper as the coating
gets a yellow cast. Friday I have coated some prints with a matt waterbased
acryl varnish made by Lascaux. Liquitex will have the same. Coating prints
with silkscreen isn't the problem. The blacks on German Etching have lost
their nice velvet texture and high density and that is what most customers
want. I don't think that will be possible, getting more protection and
keeping the texture.

For gloss there's no problem. But they do not order gloss.

Using an air (hydrogen) curing urethane in a silkscreen frame isn't
something I long for. It will be worse than printing a two component epoxy
ink on a run that takes almost the total curing time. I've been there.
Then for silkscreen printing it is nicer to have at least 20 prints of the
same size to print than make all kinds of adaptions with tape etc to do the
same run for different sizes. I will try a gloss water based urethane/acryl
varnish this week. It is difficult to get the sole urethane water based
varnishes here. Don't expect much of it though. If it is the best since
sliced bread I certainly will write about it.

Ernst

Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow

2002-12-09 by Robert Morrison

On 12/8/02 9:57 PM, "Peter Marquis-Kyle" <petermk@...> wrote:

> I have never coated a print with a squeegee or a mayer rod, but it
> seems to me that screen printing would allow you to put down a
> precisely defined area of coating -- perhaps just larger than the
> printed image -- rather than a messy edge that threatens to glue the
> print to the workbench.

Screen printing is high sheer process and really messy compared to rod
coating.  It would require formulating a product specifically for that
application.  I've seen a bunch of prints coated using conventional screen
top coats and they have been brittle and yellow.

Its possible to mask with a rod if you want the paper exposed.

Robert

Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow

2002-12-09 by Ernst Dinkla

----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "Robert Morrison" <rmorrison@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow


> On 12/8/02 9:57 PM, "Peter Marquis-Kyle" <petermk@...> wrote:
>
> > I have never coated a print with a squeegee or a mayer rod, but it
> > seems to me that screen printing would allow you to put down a
> > precisely defined area of coating -- perhaps just larger than the
> > printed image -- rather than a messy edge that threatens to glue the
> > print to the workbench.
>
> Screen printing is high sheer process and really messy compared to rod
> coating.  It would require formulating a product specifically for that
> application.  I've seen a bunch of prints coated using conventional screen
> top coats and they have been brittle and yellow.
>
> Its possible to mask with a rod if you want the paper exposed.

Robert has an even less optimistic view on silkscreen printing than I have.
But I'm a silkscreen printer.
Silkscreen printing shouldn't be messy. You need more equipment than with
rod application. Manual rod application has its place up to a size and up to
a quantity. Above that you need a dedicated coating machine which could be a
silkscreen table or a machine. And like with any coating for inkjet prints
the coating has to be suitable for the process and the print. When someone
is new to coating and his prints and printruns are small then there's no
substitute for a rod.

Ernst

Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow

2002-12-09 by Mark Tucker <mark@marktucker.com>

>--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Peter 
>Marquis-Kyle" <petermk@o...> wrote:
> When I saw Mark Tucker's pictures of his spray booth, I thought 
>of
> masking tape for the same purpose.

---

Yes, removeable tape would work. I also thought about having a 
standard mat cut, and then overlaying that over the print before 
spraying, as a mask. YOu would just need to quickly remove the 
mat after the spray. Might be more a problem too if the print/mat 
was hanging vertically.

I sprayed three prints last night and had my best luck ever. I'm 
getting the hang of it. I've found though, best to use a wide fan 
spray adjustment for better evenness. (I'm coating 24x30s). I 
also have switched to the Satin version, rather than gloss. More 
subtle. 

I don't seem to mind the look of just coating the whole print 
though. With the Wingel or Oleopasto, when it was going on 
super-thick, and handdone with a brush, I *did* prefer coating 
only the image; somehow that seemed right. But with the spray, 
it feels right to just spray the whole thing.

Again, I'm doing all this for increased DMAX. Others are doing it 
for protection, so they can frame it without glass. I may still frame 
with glass for display prints. But certainly, for my commercial 
portfolio, which is a box with individual loose prints, the coating 
will protect those prints and give them longer life and less 
scuffing.

MT, http://www.marktucker.com

Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow

2002-12-09 by Steven Karafyllakis <stevek@evcom.net>

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Marquis-
Kyle" <petermk@o...> wrote:
> Steve K wrote suggesting silk screen printing for coating inkjet
> prints.
> 
> I have never coated a print with a squeegee or a mayer rod, but it
> seems to me that screen printing would allow you to put down a
> precisely defined area of coating -- perhaps just larger than the
> printed image -- rather than a messy edge that threatens to glue 
the
> print to the workbench.
> 
>
Peter;

Yes, that is an advantage I didn't mention- with a little care and 
refinement in positioning tecnique, you could get as accurate as 
your printer paper positioning allows. I'd like to think you could 
coat only the image area and not the white paper, but the printer 
mechanics would make that inconsistent. But the taping would be on 
the inside of the screen not on the print, which means there's no 
risk of tearing the paper peeling up masking tape.

Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow

2002-12-09 by Ernst Dinkla

----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: <stevek@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow


> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Marquis-
> Kyle" <petermk@o...> wrote:
> > Steve K wrote suggesting silk screen printing for coating inkjet
> > prints.
> >
> > I have never coated a print with a squeegee or a mayer rod, but it
> > seems to me that screen printing would allow you to put down a
> > precisely defined area of coating -- perhaps just larger than the
> > printed image -- rather than a messy edge that threatens to glue
> the
> > print to the workbench.
> >
> >
> Peter;
>
> Yes, that is an advantage I didn't mention- with a little care and
> refinement in positioning tecnique, you could get as accurate as
> your printer paper positioning allows. I'd like to think you could
> coat only the image area and not the white paper, but the printer
> mechanics would make that inconsistent. But the taping would be on
> the inside of the screen not on the print, which means there's no
> risk of tearing the paper peeling up masking tape.


To get propper registration one could inkjet print some extra marks on the
paper. With overlay transparent film on the silkscreen table you can get the
print at the right spot by aligning the marks to marks put on the
transparent sheet. Usually with small printruns when there's no registration
possible because the deckle is too rough or the artist wants the image at
more places than one I silkscreen print first on a transparent that has been
tape-hinged at one side then put the to be printed sheet underneath it so it
aligns and then flip the transparent aside and print the sheet. Cutting the
sheet carefully on inkjet printed cut marks and then using the normal
registration tabs on the table will work as well.

Any changes in the matt paper colour or texture with waterbased acryl
varnishes are hard to see I have to admit, so printing to the edge of the
image may be a bit over the top for those papers. Of course when you can
create a texture change or gloss to matt difference between margin and image
then it has sense.
The sealing of the paper itself has an advantage when the paper will stain
from air polution if exposed without glass. Hahnemuhle coatings have that
problem.

Ernst

Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow

2002-12-09 by Steven Karafyllakis <stevek@evcom.net>

Robert;
> 
> " high sheer process ">   Sorry, don't know what that means in 
relation to hand-screened process. 
>>It would require formulating a product specifically for that
> application.  I've seen a bunch of prints coated using 
conventional screen
> top coats and they have been brittle and yellow.

I don't propose using conventional screen anything-if it doesn't 
work with the same materials and produce comparable results it's not 
worth doing.
> 
> Its possible to mask with a rod if you want the paper exposed.
> 
I'm quite sure it is possible to tape-on the paper. Press the tape 
down hard enough to keep the liquid from seeping under the edges, 
and you may take some of it away with you when you lift the tape.  
And you MUST peel the tape while the coating is still quite soft, or 
the tape will also lift the edges of the coating.
This is a major problem on rough/soft surface papers. 
 Steve K

Changing Densities

2002-12-09 by Wendel White

Has anyone experienced "random" changes in print density? I am printing with
an Epson 7000, MIS-FS, ImagePrint, and Photo-Rag (MediaStreet version.) I
have areas that contain solid fills and occasionally the fill (64% Black)
prints lighter. Nozzle checks are OK and I cannot find a difference in files
(in Photoshop the dropper says 64% and the Gray space is the same.)

Wendel

Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow

2002-12-09 by Shire,Stanley

We don't have a screen printing studio, setup, etc.
What would be used for thee coating,? The poly dries way too fast for this to work and the screen would get mucked up after the first print. Maybe someone with more experience with clear coatings and silkscreen could help
Stan
Show quoted textHide quoted text
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: mailto:Steven Karafyllakis <stevek@... 
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 12:10 AM
  Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow


  --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Shire,Stanley" 
  <sshire@c...> wrote:
  > More test results. At Paul's suggestion I laid a few sheets of copy
  > paper under the print. Better. Recommended.
  > I also tried covering the copy paper and glass with Saran Wrap. My
  > thought was to leave the print undisturbed until dry.
  > Bad idea. The poly did not dry on the bottom. I removed it and 
  dried it
  > on a junk matboard. 
  > All was well. Print looks great. Printed a second copy, uncoated 
  for
  > densitometer measurements tomorrow.
  > Next try will be to dry the print on a fiberglass screen (I knew 
  there
  > was a reason not to toss those silver print drying screens.)
  >  
  > Stan Shire
  > Associate Professor/Department Chair
  > Photographic Imaging
  > Community College of Philadelphia

  Hi Stanley;

  Not to throw you off on a tangent, but have any of you guys done any 
  silk-screening? I mean the manual fine-art type of course. I think 
  it may be useable as a way to coat large prints. If  not, let me 
  describe the equipment, and why I think it would work.
  A screen-printing frame is a 2"x2" wood frame of whatever size with 
  very fine polyester mesh stretched across it (Iâ?Tm not asking you to 
  wear it now!) and a 2inch or so border of wide paper tape around the 
  inside perimeter of the mesh, also covering the sides of the frame 
  itself.  When you print, the frame is hinged at one end, and 1/8 
  inch high small cardboard slivers at each corner keep it of the 
  paper until youâ?Tre ready to print. When youâ?Tre ready to â?~pull a 
  printâ?T you pour a thick bead of ink onto the protective tape border, 
  put a flat heavy rubber squeegee behind the ink, press down and pull 
  simultaneously all the way down the length of the print until the 
  pool of excess ink is all back on the tape border again. As you pass 
  down, the screen behind you lifts up off the paper, having deposited 
  a smooth layer of ink on your paper, and then pops of completely 
  when you release pressure. A second pas in the other direction fills 
  in any gaps and returns the excess to the top, ready for another 
  pass. Wether or not there is a screen texture in the image depends 
  on the viscosity of the ink and the coarseness of the screen, but I 
  think that coating materials are all much thinner than ink and would 
  lay down flat immediately. Iâ?Tm quite sure that if it does work, (and 
  I think it will) it will work as well for large prints as it does 
  for small ones, and the setup costs are way less than airbrush 
  spraying equipment,  and of course not spraying it is way less 
  dangerous to your health.
  So. My question to you Stan is this: does your College have a 
  screen-printing studio? If it does, perhaps you could go by and 
  watch someone pull a few prints and evaluate the idea? If not, I 
  will eventually try it myself, (I have an old screen around 
  somewhere) but it may be a few weeks before I have the time what 
  with Christmas and other projects in process.

  I look forward to hearing from you

  Steve K

  http://www.stevekphoto.com

     


  > Adobe Photoshop 6 A.C.E.
  > Author: Hands On Photoshop 7: Tutorial Workshops
  > 
  >


  Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

  If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.

  Please follow these basic guidelines:
  - Include your full name with your message.
  - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
  - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
  - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
  - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or &amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
  - Complete your Yahoo profile.
  - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. 




  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow

2002-12-09 by Robert Morrison

On 12/9/02 7:57 AM, "Steven Karafyllakis <stevek@...>"
<stevek@...> wrote:

> Robert;
>> 
>> " high sheer process "

>Sorry, don't know what that means in
>relation to hand-screened process.

It means that the screen itself creates an enormous amount of shear when you
force a liquid through it.  The types of coatings that we are using foam
like crazy because of the sheer. As a result silk screen inks are much more
viscous than the liquids that we have all been using to coat with.  That
means that unless you are going to formulate a product yourself you will be
limited to using screen overprint varnishes...which in my experience have
yellowing problems and are very "hard" which means they are brittle.

Compared to rod coating screen printing requires an enormous
equipment/space/facility (big sink) investment.  I agree that for someone
that has a screen printing facility (like Jon Cone) and has chemistry
formulating experience and needs to coat large (larger than 24"x) prints it
may be an option.

>> Its possible to mask with a rod if you want the paper exposed.
>> 
> I'm quite sure it is possible to tape-on the paper. Press the tape
> down hard enough to keep the liquid from seeping under the edges,
> and you may take some of it away with you when you lift the tape.

That is a potential problem.  I'm not sure how many people out there want to
coat like this...but honestly I'm hard pressed to think of an
application...perhaps books?  Most people that I know either crop and then
dry mount or else they matte the prints...either way this wouldn't be an
issue. An additional reason not to coat just the print and leave the paper
is handling.  Uncoated paper gets dirty fast.  By coating you can simply
wash a portfolio off after it comes back from the greasy fingers of the
gallery owner.

Robert

Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow

2002-12-09 by Steven Karafyllakis <stevek@evcom.net>

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Ernst Dinkla" 
<E.Dinkla@c...> wrote:
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <stevek@e...>
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 4:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and 
workflow
> 
> 
> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Peter 
Marquis-
> > Kyle" <petermk@o...> wrote:
> > > Steve K wrote suggesting silk screen printing for coating 
inkjet
> > > prints.
> > >
> > > I have never coated a print with a squeegee or a mayer rod, 
but it
> > > seems to me that screen printing would allow you to put down a
> > > precisely defined area of coating -- perhaps just larger than 
the
> > > printed image -- rather than a messy edge that threatens to 
glue
> > the
> > > print to the workbench.
> > >
> > >
> > Peter;
> >
> > Yes, that is an advantage I didn't mention- with a little care 
and
> > refinement in positioning tecnique, you could get as accurate as
> > your printer paper positioning allows. I'd like to think you 
could
> > coat only the image area and not the white paper, but the printer
> > mechanics would make that inconsistent. But the taping would be 
on
> > the inside of the screen not on the print, which means there's no
> > risk of tearing the paper peeling up masking tape.
> 
> 
> To get propper registration one could inkjet print some extra 
marks on the
> paper. With overlay transparent film on the silkscreen table you 
can get the
> print at the right spot by aligning the marks to marks put on the
> transparent sheet. Usually with small printruns when there's no 
registration
> possible because the deckle is too rough or the artist wants the 
image at
> more places than one I silkscreen print first on a transparent 
that has been
> tape-hinged at one side then put the to be printed sheet 
underneath it so it
> aligns and then flip the transparent aside and print the sheet. 
Cutting the
> sheet carefully on inkjet printed cut marks and then using the 
normal
> registration tabs on the table will work as well.
> 
> Any changes in the matt paper colour or texture with waterbased 
acryl
> varnishes are hard to see I have to admit, so printing to the edge 
of the
> image may be a bit over the top for those papers. Of course when 
you can
> create a texture change or gloss to matt difference between margin 
and image
> then it has sense.
> The sealing of the paper itself has an advantage when the paper 
will stain
> from air polution if exposed without glass. Hahnemuhle coatings 
have that
> problem.
> 
> Ernst

I'm not sure sure there's any real aesthetic advantage to printing 
to the edge of the image, and staining, dirt, moisture etc. are much 
more of a concern. Are we fairly sure at this point of the long-term 
integrity of these coatings? I remeber Paul Roark posted something 
about that, but the details escape me right now.

Steve K

Re: [Digital BW] Mayer Rod Substitute...the saga and workflow

2002-12-10 by Ernst Dinkla

Steve, you wrote:

> > create a texture change or gloss to matt difference between margin
> and image
> > then it has sense.
> > The sealing of the paper itself has an advantage when the paper
> will stain
> > from air polution if exposed without glass. Hahnemuhle coatings
> have that
> > problem.
> >
> > Ernst
>
> I'm not sure sure there's any real aesthetic advantage to printing
> to the edge of the image, and staining, dirt, moisture etc. are much
> more of a concern. Are we fairly sure at this point of the long-term
> integrity of these coatings? I remeber Paul Roark posted something
> about that, but the details escape me right now.

Spot varnishing? (I'm Dutch) is an accepted aesthetic technique in the
graphic industry.
With inkjet printing you will see more graphic industry conventions transfer
to photography.
I've printed a meadow landscape with poppies etc. for an artist, almost
invisible, slightly more yellow the text 'goed zijn' (being good/well) is
printed in the middle. That would have been more complicated in conventional
colour photography and it wouldn't have blended in as nice. Transparent
masks, duplicates etc. Ten years ago the artist probably would have chosen
an offset proofprint to get a similar image quality.

Could well be that the reverse of spot varnishing is of interest to us. Seal
the margin of the print with a  invisible matt coating to keep out the dirt
while the image isn't changed by any varnish application.

It is hard to tell how long the coating's internal bond and to the substrate
will last. The Hahnemuhle coating is something to worry about. The first
Hahnemuhle coatings were used on papers that Lyson distributed for Iris
printing.  About 5/6 years old now I guess. Any sign that those prints show
problems ? The use of exhibition papers like German Etching is of course
different than the use of wedding pics. It is also hard to say whether a
varnish will improve the paper/coating bond, if the varnish doesn't get to
the paper at all it may be worse. Especially with less flexible varnishes.
Flaking resistance / internal coating bond will almost always improve with a
varnish.

Ernst

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.