Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

QuadToneRIP 1.1 is ready

QuadToneRIP 1.1 is ready

2003-03-11 by Roy Harrington

Hi All,

The new version is ready to download.  I've greatly simplified getting started
by pre-loading all the popular Epson printers.  (If you have a different one let
me know).  I've used it a lot on an 1160, some others on 1280's and 7500.
It also includes curves for doing neutral prints on a 2200 using just a small
amount of cyan and magenta and no yellow ink -- no metamerism.

It's all easy to configure different curves for different printers.  There are also 
some new curve making procedures that make it possible to create your own
curves without a phd in curveology.

See:
http://harrington.com/QuadToneRIP.html

Thanks for all the interest.
Roy

Re: [Digital BW] QuadToneRIP 1.1 is ready

2003-03-12 by Margaret Lucas

Roy,

I'm getting absolutely the *best ever* 2200 prints with your 
QuadToneRIP.

Thank you for sharing!!

margaret lucas
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 07:49 PM, Roy Harrington wrote:

>
> Hi All,
>
> The new version is ready to download.  I've greatly simplified getting 
> started
> by pre-loading all the popular Epson printers.  (If you have a 
> different one let
> me know).  I've used it a lot on an 1160, some others on 1280's and 
> 7500.
> It also includes curves for doing neutral prints on a 2200 using just 
> a small
> amount of cyan and magenta and no yellow ink -- no metamerism.
>
> It's all easy to configure different curves for different printers.  
> There are also
> some new curve making procedures that make it possible to create your 
> own
> curves without a phd in curveology.
>
> See:
> http://harrington.com/QuadToneRIP.html
>
> Thanks for all the interest.
> Roy
>

Re: [Digital BW] QuadToneRIP 1.1 is ready

2003-03-13 by chipcarterdc

I just got everything configured and made my first print using this program.  I 
want to look at it a lot more and in daylight, so take my preliminary words with 
a big grain of salt.

By way of background, I have tried B&W printing on my 2200 using 5 different 
methods/programs thus far.  In order of my personal preference, I rank them 
below (best to worst):

(1) ImagePrint 5
(2) QuadTone RIP 1.1 (using Carl Scholfield's neutral curve)
(3) Normal epson driver, using Postcript Color Management + Color Controls: 
Photorealistic method (Carl Schofield (sorry for misspelling your name))
(4) Epson 2200 RIP
(5) Normal Epson driver, using paper profile + no color adjustment mode

To return to QuadTone RIP:  I'm looking at a print of the same image printed 
using QuadTone RIP and ImagePrint.  The IP print looks "richer" and more 
"neutral."  It's hard to explain, and perhaps part of the difference is that the IP 
one is on Epson Velvet and the QuadTone RIP one is on Enhanced Matte.  
But even so, the IP print appears to be a more neutral grayscale to me.  The 
QuadTone print seems to tend every so slightly toward a greenish-gray.  I do 
mean slightly -- perhaps the best way to describe the difference is the 
difference between what Ilford fiber paper looks like with selenium toning and 
without it (with the IP print looking more like a selenium toned fiber print).  

The thing is,  this is probably just a personal preference thing.  AND you can 
create your own ink curves for QuadTone (you can -- it's way above my head, 
so I haven't even tried), so you could probably adjust it to suit your personal 
preference of what neutral should look like.  AND neither print shows color 
shift under different light (tungsten and halogen so far).

Given that QuadTone costs $500 less than IP, I think the choice is pretty easy.  
I commend Roy for this program and hope it only gets better.

Re: [Digital BW] QuadToneRIP 1.1 is ready

2003-03-13 by Roy Harrington

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, 
"chipcarterdc" <chipcarterdc@h...> wrote:
> I just got everything configured and made my first print using 
this program.  I 
> want to look at it a lot more and in daylight, so take my 
preliminary words with 
> a big grain of salt.
> 
> By way of background, I have tried B&W printing on my 2200 
using 5 different 
> methods/programs thus far.  In order of my personal 
preference, I rank them 
> below (best to worst):
> 
> (1) ImagePrint 5
> (2) QuadTone RIP 1.1 (using Carl Scholfield's neutral curve)
> (3) Normal epson driver, using Postcript Color Management + 
Color Controls: 
> Photorealistic method (Carl Schofield (sorry for misspelling 
your name))
> (4) Epson 2200 RIP
> (5) Normal Epson driver, using paper profile + no color 
adjustment mode
> 
> To return to QuadTone RIP:  I'm looking at a print of the same 
image printed 
> using QuadTone RIP and ImagePrint.  The IP print looks 
"richer" and more 
> "neutral."  It's hard to explain, and perhaps part of the difference 
is that the IP 
> one is on Epson Velvet and the QuadTone RIP one is on 
Enhanced Matte.  
> But even so, the IP print appears to be a more neutral 
grayscale to me.  The 
> QuadTone print seems to tend every so slightly toward a 
greenish-gray.  I do 
> mean slightly -- perhaps the best way to describe the 
difference is the 
> difference between what Ilford fiber paper looks like with 
selenium toning and 
> without it (with the IP print looking more like a selenium toned 
fiber print).  
> 
> The thing is,  this is probably just a personal preference thing.  
AND you can 
> create your own ink curves for QuadTone (you can -- it's way 
above my head, 
> so I haven't even tried), so you could probably adjust it to suit 
your personal 
> preference of what neutral should look like.  AND neither print 
shows color 
> shift under different light (tungsten and halogen so far).
> 
> Given that QuadTone costs $500 less than IP, I think the 
choice is pretty easy.  
> I commend Roy for this program and hope it only gets better.

Sounds like its pretty close.  I thank Carl for his efforts in working
on the curve.  I think he did it by eye so everyone may see
things a little differently.  The initial problem with the 2200 is
the brown tone which is mainly neutralized by cyan.  There is
a little magenta being added already but it sounds you'd like a
little more.   Curves may sound daunting but just adding one
color is pretty easy.  Print out a step wedge to decide where you 
want some change.  Then look in the Ultrachrome folder,
copy Carl's psd file to a new name and look at it in Photoshop.
There's just one Adjustment Curve Layer, click it, find the
magenta curve.   Nudge it up in the area you think looks 
green on the step wedge.  Save the psd file and then also
Save As a Raw file.  Name it UC-user1.quad  then drag it
into CurveDropBox.   You're ready to go.  Print now with your
UC-user-1 curve.  Try it and see, modify it as you see fit.

It would be great if someone with a color densitometer could
tweak these curves.  Any takers?

Roy

Re: [Digital BW] QuadToneRIP 1.1 is ready

2003-03-13 by Charles Bandes

I have some preliminary curves designed for the 1280 and VM inks which I would be happy to share with people if there's interest. They are pretty good, but could use some tweaking by someone who's more skillful than me.

Re: [Digital BW] QuadToneRIP 1.1 is ready

2003-03-13 by Carl Schofield

On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, at 09:48  PM, Roy Harrington wrote:

> Sounds like its pretty close.  I thank Carl for his efforts in working
> on the curve.  I think he did it by eye so everyone may see
> things a little differently.  The initial problem with the 2200 is
> the brown tone which is mainly neutralized by cyan.  There is
> a little magenta being added already but it sounds you'd like a
> little more.   Curves may sound daunting but just adding one
> color is pretty easy.  Print out a step wedge to decide where you
> want some change.  Then look in the Ultrachrome folder,
> copy Carl's psd file to a new name and look at it in Photoshop.
> There's just one Adjustment Curve Layer, click it, find the
> magenta curve.   Nudge it up in the area you think looks
> green on the step wedge.  Save the psd file and then also
> Save As a Raw file.  Name it UC-user1.quad  then drag it
> into CurveDropBox.   You're ready to go.  Print now with your
> UC-user-1 curve.  Try it and see, modify it as you see fit.
>
> It would be great if someone with a color densitometer could
> tweak these curves.  Any takers?

I would also appreciate some help tweaking the 2200 neutral curve.  I 
do not have a densitometer and as Roy indicated the draft curve was 
constructed by eye with a lot of trial and error tweaking and printing 
of step wedges.  Are there any soft proofing techniques available that 
could be used in the curve construction process?

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.