RE: [Digital BW] Plugin or procedure for dust removal based on se lection?
2003-05-12 by Alessandro Pardi
Agreed, the same approach works also for artifacts due to sharpening. If I want to print at 13x19", I set the magnification in Photoshop so that it's the same as the print size (set image size to the final print and then change magnification until inches on the ruler you see on your screen are, well, inches), and then start working with sharpening tools. Taking a look at 100% magnification will make your hair raise, as the image will look awful, but this won't show on the print. Does anyone else use this procedure? I always heard about sharpening at 100%... BTW, the difference with spotting is that you may want to spot at 100% just to get rid of it once and for all, rather than have to go through this boring step again if you want to print larger someday (this isn't the case with sharpening, as you *have* to sharpen from scratch if you change print size in order to obtain the best results). Alessandro Pardi
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message----- From: Jason DeFontes [mailto:jason@...] Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 18:33 To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Plugin or procedure for dust removal based on selection? I used to do that, but now I usually print a proof at the final size first, then circle all the spots on the proof where I can actually see the dust in the final print, and go back and fix only those spots. I found I was cleaning up a lot of stuff that didn't make a difference. -Jason > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff Borkowski [mailto:h1@...] > > I've found nothing better than doing it manually using the > clone stamp and healing brush tools. I call it "mowing the > lawn". Viewing the image at 100% and filling the screen, i > use keyboard shortcuts [(ctrl) page up/down] to > systematically go through the entire image starting at the > top left corner, moving left to right / top to bottom. > ensures you don't miss anything and maximal control in terms > of not overdoing (or softening) the image. > > provided you start out with a good clean scan, the process is > not too bad. takes me usually 1 - 1.5 hours per image. late > at night, with some music, i find it cathartic ;-) > > Hope this helps! > > Jeff Yahoo! Groups Sponsor <http://rd.yahoo.com/M=253836.3292413.4586251.1626137/D=egroupweb/S=17050191 82:HM/A=1300107/R=1/*http://local.yahoo.com/> Enter: <http://rd.yahoo.com/M=253836.3292413.4586251.1626137/D=egroupweb/S=17050191 82:HM/A=1300107/R=2/*http://local.yahoo.com/> <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=253836.3292413.4586251.1626137/D=egroupmai l/S=:HM/A=1300107/rand=405517751> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - Include your full name with your message. - Include the address of your website, if you have one. - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or &amp;quot;flames.&amp;quot; - Complete your Yahoo profile. - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]