Digital BW, The Print

Have you tried Scitex Final Touch? It is Mac only.
Mark

Daniel Staver wrote:

> Is there a plugin or procedure I could use to remove dust from a picture
> based on a selection of the dust? I basically want to do the same thing
> most scanners do in software based on the IR channel in an image. I use
> vuescan with my FS4000US but the dust removal softens the image
> noitcably, while if I scan the IR channel myself and adjust it in
> photoshop I can get a good, clean selection that should enable me to
> remove all the dust without any softening.
>
> I've tried the dust & scratches filter, but it softens the image - I
> want to maintain the grain structure. The polaroid dust and scratches
> filter applied to the selection doesn't work that well either, it
> doesn't remove enough dust, and when it does it also softens the grain
> structure.
>
> --
> Daniel Staver
> http://daniel.staver.no
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
> <http://rd.yahoo.com/M=247865.3003379.4507215.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1705019182:HM/A=1482387/R=0/*http://ads.x10.com/?bHlhaG9vaG0xLmRhd=1052218268%3eM=247865.3003379.4507215.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1705019182:HM/A=1482387/R=1=1052218268%3eM=247865.3003379.4507215.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1705019182:HM/A=1482387/R=2> 
>
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls 
> and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish 
> to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting 
> this same page.
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to 
> keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
> &amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the 
> various resources on the homepage.
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service 
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

> Have you tried Scitex Final Touch? It is Mac only.

Sorry, I'm using Windows XP.


--
Daniel Staver
http://daniel.staver.no

I've found nothing better than doing it manually using the clone stamp and
healing brush tools. I call it "mowing the lawn". Viewing the image at 100%
and filling the screen, i use keyboard shortcuts [(ctrl) page up/down] to
systematically go through the entire image starting at the top left corner,
moving left to right / top to bottom. ensures you don't miss anything and
maximal control in terms of not overdoing (or softening) the image.

provided you start out with a good clean scan, the process is not too bad.
takes me usually 1 - 1.5 hours per image. late at night, with some music, i
find it cathartic ;-)

Hope this helps!

 Jeff

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Daniel Staver [mailto:daniel@...]
    Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 6:51 AM
    To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
    Subject: [Digital BW] Plugin or procedure for dust removal based on
selection?


    Is there a plugin or procedure I could use to remove dust from a picture
    based on a selection of the dust? I basically want to do the same thing
    most scanners do in software based on the IR channel in an image. I use
    vuescan with my FS4000US but the dust removal softens the image
    noitcably, while if I scan the IR channel myself and adjust it in
    photoshop I can get a good, clean selection that should enable me to
    remove all the dust without any softening.

    I've tried the dust & scratches filter, but it softens the image - I
    want to maintain the grain structure. The polaroid dust and scratches
    filter applied to the selection doesn't work that well either, it
    doesn't remove enough dust, and when it does it also softens the grain
    structure.

    --
    Daniel Staver
    http://daniel.staver.no



          Yahoo! Groups Sponsor





    Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

    If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
page.

    Please follow these basic guidelines:
    - Include your full name with your message.
    - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
    - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to
keep them short.
    - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject
header.
    - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
"flames."
    - Complete your Yahoo profile.
    - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage.




    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I used to do that, but now I usually print a proof at the final size
first, then circle all the spots on the proof where I can actually see
the dust in the final print, and go back and fix only those spots. I
found I was cleaning up a lot of stuff that didn't make a difference.

-Jason

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Borkowski [mailto:h1@...] 
> 
> I've found nothing better than doing it manually using the 
> clone stamp and healing brush tools. I call it "mowing the 
> lawn". Viewing the image at 100% and filling the screen, i 
> use keyboard shortcuts [(ctrl) page up/down] to 
> systematically go through the entire image starting at the 
> top left corner, moving left to right / top to bottom. 
> ensures you don't miss anything and maximal control in terms 
> of not overdoing (or softening) the image.
> 
> provided you start out with a good clean scan, the process is 
> not too bad. takes me usually 1 - 1.5 hours per image. late 
> at night, with some music, i find it cathartic ;-)
> 
> Hope this helps!
> 
>  Jeff

On 5/12/03 10:32 AM, "Jason DeFontes" <jason@...> wrote:

> I used to do that, but now I usually print a proof at the final size
> first, then circle all the spots on the proof where I can actually see
> the dust in the final print, and go back and fix only those spots. I
> found I was cleaning up a lot of stuff that didn't make a difference.
> 
> -Jason


Jason -

Excellent point

Jim