Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Re: ultratones and glossy paper

Re: ultratones and glossy paper

2003-06-26 by Bruce

on 6/26/2003 2:48 AM, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com at
DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com wrote:


Paul Roark wrote:
> On Premium Luster and Ilford Smooth Glossy, the MIS UT inks seem to dust
> very slightly in the shadows (where there is a high load of pigments).  I
> mixed an Epson UC based cyan for the UT inkset and that plus Epson Photo
> Black took care of it




Does the Ultratone matte black (is the same as Ebony Black?) work on the
glossy papers if one sprays?  I'd like to spray for glossy and print for
matte with one inkset if possible.

Also are the inks in the FS inkset the same as the Ultratones, only not
toneable?
 
-Bruce

Visit my website at:
http://home.earthlink.net/~smthopr

RE: [Digital BW] Re: ultratones and glossy paper

2003-06-26 by Paul Roark

Bruce,

>Paul Roark wrote:
>> On Premium Luster and Ilford Smooth Glossy, the MIS UT inks seem to dust
>> very slightly in the shadows (where there is a high load of pigments).  I
>> mixed an Epson UC based cyan for the UT inkset and that plus Epson Photo
>> Black took care of it


>Does the Ultratone matte black (is the same as Ebony Black?) work on the
>glossy papers if one sprays?

The matte black that is currently sold with the Ultra Tone inkset is called
"Eboni" black.

I have not tried spraying it.  I assume it would work to about the same
extend other matte blacks work if sprayed.  Eboni, like Museum and Epson UC
Matte black, is a high-load ink.  That is, it has about twice the amount of
particles in suspension as the older inks.  As such, it might require a
higher amount of spray to hold it down.

I'll try spraying one.

(I tried waxing it and it rubbed right off.)

>  I'd like to spray for glossy and print for
>matte with one inkset if possible.

A universal black would be great.  MIS sells one, but it has dye in it.

>Also are the inks in the FS inkset the same as the Ultratones, only not
>toneable?

No, the FS inks are old-style inks -- they have some dye in them.  The
standard FS warms.  The FS-N does not warm, but it is no more lightfast than
the FS.

[Digital BW] Re: ultratones and glossy paper

2003-06-26 by sceptre12345

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" 
<paul.roark@v...> wrote:

> No, the FS inks are old-style inks -- they have some dye in them.  
The
> standard FS warms.  The FS-N does not warm, but it is no more 
lightfast than
> the FS.

Your comments raises some concerns. Does this apply even with the new 
Eboni black and what is the lightfastness of the FS-N inkset compared 
to the UT inkset ?

I just received a bottled inkset of FS-N which I havent opened yet.
Thanks,
Andre

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Ultra-Tones and glossy paper

2003-06-26 by Paul Roark

Andre,


>--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark"
><paul.roark@v...> wrote:

>> ... the FS inks are old-style inks -- they have some dye in them.
>>The standard FS warms.  The FS-N does not warm, but it is
>>no more lightfast than the FS.

>Your comments raises some concerns. Does this apply even with the new
>Eboni black and what is the lightfastness of the FS-N inkset compared
>to the UT inkset ?

The old vm black was just one of the problems.  I believe the black inks
from which the FS & FS-N inksets were mixed had dye in them.  So, the old
midtones are "polluted" in my view.  The FS-N will look good for a long time
because it does not warm significantly, but it's not in the same class as
the Ultra-Tones.  It fades at the same rate as the FS inkset (which is
largely what it is).

We were originally led to beleive that the old black pigs were "coated" with
a black colorant.  The clear impression was that it was a solid substance
around the carbon core.  This has now been labeled an "urban myth" (by the
same unnamed person -- not at MIS -- who, I beleive, originally spread the
myth).  I beleive that the old carbon blacks simply had liquid dye thrown
in, just in a lesser amount than the Gen 4 hybrid.

My fade tests suggest that the warming experienced by the older inkset is
90% caused by the dyes burning off.  The carbon warming is a very small and
slow.  The apparently lower fade/warm rate of the vm-cool/cold and FS-N
inksets is due to the cyan pigment that was used.  That cyan pigment is
extremely lightfast compared to the other pigments and dyes at the time.
So, as they faded, the cyan became relatively more prominent and offset some
of the warming.

The current generation of carbon, however, is even better than the cyan
pigments.  That is probably why the PT warm-neutral is more lightfast than
the PT selenium.  Also, the latest color pigments are even better than the
old MIS "archival" set.

I think it was the UltraChrome light black and Photo Black, and, more
precisely, the clone inks of that inkset, that got us pure carbon to work
from.  All the quad inksets before these came out were based on the old
("polluted," as it turns out) black inks.  Before the new "high load" inks
were developed, there was simply no way to get a good black except by adding
black dye.  Since the B&W market is so tiny, the inks that were use for it
were simply dilutions of the black inks that were used in the color inksets.

Frankly, I want MIS to discontinue all the old inksets.  I doubt they will,
but I think as long as they are used the field will be hurt by the warming
and fading of those dye-polluted inksets.

Paul
http://www.PaulRoark.com

RE: [Digital BW] Re: UltraTones and glossy paper

2003-06-26 by Paul Roark

Bruce,

>...  I'd like to spray for glossy and print for
>matte with one inkset if possible.

Someday we'll have a true, pure-pigment, universal black, but it's not here
yet.

I sprayed some Ultra Tone RC print test strips using Eboni/matte black. I
used Epson Premium Luster and Epson Glossy Photo Paper.  I did what I'd
consider 3 light sprays, with a little drying with a hair drier between
them - all very quickly.

The Photo Paper print looks fairly good and has a dmax of 1.92 after the
spray.  The 100% black patch is not as smooth as the Photo K version, but
it's not bad.  The difference in finish is only detectable when one looks at
a reflection off the surface.  The black patch does not rub off (at least
easily), and finger prints do not show.  So, I'd say this makes a fairly
good and cheap glossy print.  It's not perfect.  In the reflections I can
also detect pizza wheel marks -- typical of glossy surfaces.  Also, of
course, spraying is a bit of a hassle.

The Premium Luster is not as good.  The dmax is only 1.75, less than the 95%
density patch, so it is "solarized."  The black also has a more distinctly
different surface.  The good news is the there are no pizza wheel marks.  It
may be that a really heavy spray would do the trick, but it's more that I
want to do.

It looks to me like people should decide what paper they want and then see
what ink and/or spray techniques will do the trick.  Different RC papers
seem to react differently to both the inks and sprays.

Paul
http://www.PaulRoark.com

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.