Re: [Digital BW] Modified Ultratone inkset for the 2100
2003-09-09 by Nicholas Hartmann
>I mentioned in an earlier post that I tried replacing the Cyan position >with MIS-LK and the Photo Cyan position with MIS UT-Y. I got the idea >from one of the experimental inksets that Paul posted earlier, and it >seems to work very well. > >In effect I'm actually only using three inks now, but I can't really >tell the difference, except for som very slight midtone dotting around >30%. > >The curves required to balance the tones are much more gentle than full >separation curves, and the highlights stay dotless no matter what >adjustments you make. I've made a cool and a neutral warm curve for this >inkset now and might go on to make a warm curve as well. > >It's really easy to work with, and the results are great, so I might >actually stay with this for a while - At least until Paul finalizes his >dual-toner inkset... > >-- >Daniel Staver >http://daniel.staver.no Daniel - Forgive me if you've covered this already in your posts to the group, but: I assume your procedure (replacing Epson's OEM Ultrachrome Cyan with MIS light black, and OEM Ultrachrome Photo Cyan with MIS Ultratone Yellow) is aimed at neutral B&W printing. Since I've read that yellow ink is responsible for most of the metamerism characteristic of the Ultrachrone inks (typically, a green cast in daylight, magenta under tungsten illumination), how do your results look in terms of color shift under different types of light? I am looking for a way to print neutral, metamerism-free images onto a non-matte paper (Epson semigloss or luster, probably) using a 2200 printer. Thanks for any guidance, -- Nick