Digital BW, The Print

Hello everybody, I have read some of the older (2000-2001 post) 
about MIS B&W and Piezo inks, there was a test image that was made 
by Jon Cone to show there ink is better..

I would like to try that test image, anybody have it and would e-
mail it to me?

Thanks
Christopher  
cengell@...

* -----Original Message-----
* From: cengell [mailto:cengell@...] 
* Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 8:26 PM
* To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
* Subject: [Digital BW] Anybody have the Cone test file for 
* testing there Piezo inks
* 
* 
* Hello everybody, I have read some of the older (2000-2001 post) 
* about MIS B&W and Piezo inks, there was a test image that was made 
* by Jon Cone to show there ink is better..
* 
* I would like to try that test image, anybody have it and 
* would e- mail it to me?
* 
Christopher,

As far as I know that image file was never available to the public. At this
point it is pretty much ancient history (3 years is a looong time in this
game!) as it was primarily a comparison of the Piezo plug-in printer driver
with the original Piezo/Sundance inks and some other driver or RIP with the
original MIS Quad inks both done on a 3000 which uses larger droplets than
more current printers. It was primarily a software comparison and not an ink
comparison.

The current MIS and Piezotone inks are great and other than variations in
hue I don't think you would be able to distinguish one from the other on a
finished print. Even the end results of the various workflows are all pretty
much equal from what I have seen once you get to a final print.

Over a year ago I went with the hue I liked best, Selenium Piezotone, and
the Piezo plug-in that was needed to use them. Today there are a lot more
choices!

Martin Wesley
http://www.carolyn.cc/Guests/MartinWesley/pages/MW_01.html
http://www.borderless-photos.de/guests.html