Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Interesting interview with Mac Holbert of Nash Editions

Interesting interview with Mac Holbert of Nash Editions

2003-11-21 by scshaw2

Thought this might be of interest since it discusses
getting rid of the term "giclée" from the guys who 
started it all. Only first few paragraphs of interview
here with URL to entire interview at bottom of this post.
Also talks about new Epson paper.

____________________________________________
Here are excerpts from an exclusive interview 
Royce Bair, editor of Inkjet NEWS & Tips, had 
with R. Mac Holbert of Nash Editions on October 
31. <http://www.nasheditions.com/>.  (In 1990, 
Mac Holbert and Graham Nash pioneered the use of 
the IRIS 3047 Graphics Printer as an output 
device for making digital fine art prints.  One 
of their early print makers, Jack Duganne, was 
the first to coin the term "giclée" for inkjet 
prints, back in 1991 
<http://www.dpandi.com/giclee/giclee.html>. 
Today, Nash Editions use several Epson 9600's and 
only one IRIS.  Their clients include Robert 
Farber, Milton Greene, Douglas Kirkland, Winston 
Smith and Charles Wolfe, just to name a few.):

ROYCE: Mac, you recently told me that the term 
"giclée" is starting to lose popularity in our 
market?
MAC: The term "Giclée" is starting to fall out of 
use in the fine art market, at least among the 
fine art museums.  It is still being used very 
much in the "executive" art market.  I'm 
currently working with several museums to come up 
with a correct terminology.  It's very much like 
what they did with color photography years ago, 
bringing out the term "chromogenic prints".
_______________________________________________

see the rest of the interview at:

http://www.inkjetart.com/news/archive/IJN_11-20-03.html

scShaw
Atlanta

RE: [Digital BW] Interesting interview with Mac Holbert of Nash Editions

2003-11-21 by Paul Roark

The "gicl\ufffdes" referred to Iris prints that were dye-based, I believe.  The
carbon-based pigments most of us now use are far superior.  As such, I don't
want any association with that fugitive medium (not to mention the
ridiculous name's slang meaning).

Paul
http://www.PaulRoark.com
____________________________________
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: scshaw2 [mailto:scshaw@...]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 6:46 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] Interesting interview with Mac Holbert of Nash
Editions


Thought this might be of interest since it discusses
getting rid of the term "gicl\ufffde" from the guys who
started it all. Only first few paragraphs of interview
here with URL to entire interview at bottom of this post.
Also talks about new Epson paper.

____________________________________________
Here are excerpts from an exclusive interview
Royce Bair, editor of Inkjet NEWS & Tips, had
with R. Mac Holbert of Nash Editions on October
31. <http://www.nasheditions.com/>.  (In 1990,
Mac Holbert and Graham Nash pioneered the use of
the IRIS 3047 Graphics Printer as an output
device for making digital fine art prints.  One
of their early print makers, Jack Duganne, was
the first to coin the term "gicl\ufffde" for inkjet
prints, back in 1991
<http://www.dpandi.com/giclee/giclee.html>.
Today, Nash Editions use several Epson 9600's and
only one IRIS.  Their clients include Robert
Farber, Milton Greene, Douglas Kirkland, Winston
Smith and Charles Wolfe, just to name a few.):

ROYCE: Mac, you recently told me that the term
"gicl\ufffde" is starting to lose popularity in our
market?
MAC: The term "Gicl\ufffde" is starting to fall out of
use in the fine art market, at least among the
fine art museums.  It is still being used very
much in the "executive" art market.  I'm
currently working with several museums to come up
with a correct terminology.  It's very much like
what they did with color photography years ago,
bringing out the term "chromogenic prints".
_______________________________________________

see the rest of the interview at:

http://www.inkjetart.com/news/archive/IJN_11-20-03.html

scShaw
Atlanta




Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage.




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [Digital BW] Interesting interview with Mac Holbert of Nash Editions

2003-11-21 by Barrett Benton

Ain't it funny, though, how IRIS was once the Holy Grail for fine 
digital output, while most every other form of inkjet output was 
considered worse than beneath contempt, "and would ever be 
thus", as someone told me. At least he didn't throw the "G" word 
at me.

- Barrett

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul 
Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote:
>The "giclées" referred to Iris prints that were dye-based, I 
>believe.  The carbon-based pigments most of us now use are 
>far superior.  As such, I don't want any association with that 
>fugitive medium (not to mention the ridiculous name's slang 
meaning).
> 
> Paul
> http://www.PaulRoark.com
> ____________________________________
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: scshaw2 [mailto:scshaw@s...]
> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 6:46 AM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Digital BW] Interesting interview with Mac Holbert of 
Nash
> Editions
> 
> 
> Thought this might be of interest since it discusses
> getting rid of the term "giclée" from the guys who
> started it all. Only first few paragraphs of interview
> here with URL to entire interview at bottom of this post.
> Also talks about new Epson paper.
> 
> ____________________________________________
> Here are excerpts from an exclusive interview
> Royce Bair, editor of Inkjet NEWS & Tips, had
> with R. Mac Holbert of Nash Editions on October
> 31. <http://www.nasheditions.com/>.  (In 1990,
> Mac Holbert and Graham Nash pioneered the use of
> the IRIS 3047 Graphics Printer as an output
> device for making digital fine art prints.  One
> of their early print makers, Jack Duganne, was
> the first to coin the term "giclée" for inkjet
> prints, back in 1991
> <http://www.dpandi.com/giclee/giclee.html>.
> Today, Nash Editions use several Epson 9600's and
> only one IRIS.  Their clients include Robert
> Farber, Milton Greene, Douglas Kirkland, Winston
> Smith and Charles Wolfe, just to name a few.):
> 
> ROYCE: Mac, you recently told me that the term
> "giclée" is starting to lose popularity in our
> market?
> MAC: The term "Giclée" is starting to fall out of
> use in the fine art market, at least among the
> fine art museums.  It is still being used very
> much in the "executive" art market.  I'm
> currently working with several museums to come up
> with a correct terminology.  It's very much like
> what they did with color photography years ago,
> bringing out the term "chromogenic prints".
> _______________________________________________
> 
> see the rest of the interview at:
> 
> http://www.inkjetart.com/news/archive/IJN_11-20-03.html
> 
> scShaw
> Atlanta
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, 
Bookmarks, Polls and
> other resources as they are often being updated. The page is 
at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you 
wish to
> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by 
visiting this same
> page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier 
messages to keep
> them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the 
subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks 
or flames
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and 
the various
> resources on the homepage.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.